Skip to main content


Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Modeling » EMF » Is there now one command framework in the platform that EMF & GEF could use?
Is there now one command framework in the platform that EMF & GEF could use? [message #418709] Thu, 24 April 2008 17:26 Go to next message
Al B is currently offline Al BFriend
Messages: 130
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
On July 2004, Frank Budinsky mentioned about having one command framework
in the platform that EMF & GEF could use. Did that ever happen?

http://dev.eclipse.org/newslists/news.eclipse.tools.emf/msg0 5420.html
Re: Is there now one command framework in the platform that EMF & GEF could use? [message #418712 is a reply to message #418709] Thu, 24 April 2008 18:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ed Merks is currently offline Ed MerksFriend
Messages: 33142
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------080207090700080307090007
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

AJ,

Since then the platform came up with one more command famework. :-P

The GMF project integrates EMF and GEF nicely:
<http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/gmf/>

http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/gmf/


AJ wrote:
> On July 2004, Frank Budinsky mentioned about having one command
> framework in the platform that EMF & GEF could use. Did that ever happen?
>
> http://dev.eclipse.org/newslists/news.eclipse.tools.emf/msg0 5420.html
>


--------------080207090700080307090007
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-15"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
AJ,<br>
<br>
Since then the platform came up with one more command famework. :-P<br>
<br>
The GMF project integrates EMF and GEF nicely:<a
href="http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/gmf/"><br>
</a>
<blockquote><a href="http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/gmf/">http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/gmf/</a><br>
</blockquote>
<br>
AJ wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:101e92b65038b39ae055c1cc8f10c125$1@www.eclipse.org"
type="cite">On July 2004, Frank Budinsky mentioned about having one
command framework in the platform that EMF &amp; GEF could use. Did
that ever happen?
<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href=" http://dev.eclipse.org/newslists/news.eclipse.tools.emf/msg0 5420.html"> http://dev.eclipse.org/newslists/news.eclipse.tools.emf/msg0 5420.html</a>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>

--------------080207090700080307090007--


Ed Merks
Professional Support: https://www.macromodeling.com/
Re: Is there now one command framework in the platform that EMF & GEF could use? [message #418713 is a reply to message #418712] Thu, 24 April 2008 18:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Al B is currently offline Al BFriend
Messages: 130
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Ed,

Unfortunately, our current application was developed 3 years ago using
GEF. Today, we want to introduce/utilize EMF, but GMF is not an option for
us at this point.

So, does it mean that the EMF + GEF combination will be issue for us
unless we move to GMF?

By issue, I meant the known problem of having two active command stacks to
synchronize.
Re: Is there now one command framework in the platform that EMF & GEF could use? [message #418717 is a reply to message #418713] Thu, 24 April 2008 20:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ed Merks is currently offline Ed MerksFriend
Messages: 33142
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------060609060109060200000204
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

AJ,

I think it would be best to use wrappers to end up with one common
command stack. I think this book explains how:

GEF EMF Redbook
< http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/RedbookAbstract s/sg246302.html>


AJ wrote:
> Ed,
>
> Unfortunately, our current application was developed 3 years ago using
> GEF. Today, we want to introduce/utilize EMF, but GMF is not an option
> for us at this point.
>
> So, does it mean that the EMF + GEF combination will be issue for us
> unless we move to GMF?
>
> By issue, I meant the known problem of having two active command
> stacks to synchronize.
>
>


--------------060609060109060200000204
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-15"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
AJ,<br>
<br>
I think it would be best to use wrappers to end up with one common
command stack.


Ed Merks
Professional Support: https://www.macromodeling.com/
Re: Is there now one command framework in the platform that EMF & GEF could use? [message #418718 is a reply to message #418717] Thu, 24 April 2008 20:16 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Al B is currently offline Al BFriend
Messages: 130
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Ed,

Unfortunately, our hopes die in Chapter 5 (p. 166); where it says:

"We can think about using GEF and EMF together from two different
perspectives; using an EMF model within a GEF application, or augmenting
EMF.Edit-based editors using GEF. In this book, we focus on the first
perspective only. The second approach deserves a book of its own, as
integrating an EMF.Edit-based editor with GEF provides its own challenges."


So, let me know when someone has written a book about the second approach
;-)


Thanks anyway!
Re: Is there now one command framework in the platform that EMF & GEF could use? [message #418792 is a reply to message #418718] Tue, 29 April 2008 22:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
David Steinberg is currently offline David SteinbergFriend
Messages: 489
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
AJ wrote:

> So, let me know when someone has written a book about the second
> approach ;-)

Maybe the best place to start would still be with GMF's command
integration. Even if you can't use GMF, you can look at how they
tackled this problem.

Books are overrated, anyway. ;)

Cheers,
Dave
Re: Is there now one command framework in the platform that EMF & GEF could use? [message #418794 is a reply to message #418792] Tue, 29 April 2008 23:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ed Merks is currently offline Ed MerksFriend
Messages: 33142
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Dave,

Generally books are overrated, but not the second edition of the EMF
book! It's a literary work of technical excellence unsurpassed in the
modern age of technical writing. It's worth its more than its weight in
platinum. Or so I've been led to believe anyway...


Dave Steinberg wrote:
> AJ wrote:
>
>> So, let me know when someone has written a book about the second
>> approach ;-)
>
> Maybe the best place to start would still be with GMF's command
> integration. Even if you can't use GMF, you can look at how they
> tackled this problem.
>
> Books are overrated, anyway. ;)
>
> Cheers,
> Dave


Ed Merks
Professional Support: https://www.macromodeling.com/
Re: Is there now one command framework in the platform that EMF & GEF could use? [message #418874 is a reply to message #418794] Wed, 30 April 2008 14:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Al B is currently offline Al BFriend
Messages: 130
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Ed,

Is this the one that the "buzz" around Hollywood is to make it into a
movie!?!?!
Re: Is there now one command framework in the platform that EMF & GEF could use? [message #418875 is a reply to message #418874] Wed, 30 April 2008 14:50 Go to previous message
Ed Merks is currently offline Ed MerksFriend
Messages: 33142
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
AJ,

Well yes of course, but we all know that a movie can never be as good as
a book! A book can last for days, but a movie only for a few hours.
Nevertheless, with some highly attractive movie stars to play the
appropriate life-like roles, I'm sure it will be pretty cool for those
who are impressed by eye candy and not inclined to think very hard;
thinking and using your imagination can be so tiring and are nearly as
overrated as the books that stimulate such activities...


AJ wrote:
> Ed,
>
> Is this the one that the "buzz" around Hollywood is to make it into a
> movie!?!?!
>


Ed Merks
Professional Support: https://www.macromodeling.com/
Previous Topic:Standard data types in .ecore editor.
Next Topic:EMF.Edit CreateNewChildAction contribution to common Navigator based Viewer
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Apr 26 20:59:00 GMT 2024

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04632 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top