|
| Re: Is it possible to specify generated model code prefix and suffix? [message #414705 is a reply to message #414702] |
Sat, 17 November 2007 12:38  |
 Ed Merks
Messages: 33218
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Phillip,
No, though people have asked about that before. I could imagine we
could allow the client to specify a substitution pattern for both the
interface name and the implementation class name, .e.g, {0} and {0}Impl
would be the default, but I{0} and {0} would be possible. I hesitate to
suggest opening a feature request for such a thing, because we have so
many requests that we are unlikely to ever get to...
EMF has been described as "a dirty little secret" by folks who'd like to
pretend they don't rely heavily on it, and as a "Swiss army knife from
hell" by folks who think it does too much. Oh well, it's not so dirty
and clearly not so secret and while I like the Swiss army knife analogy
(hey, don't use all the utensils if you don't need them), I would have
preferred the "from hell" be dropped since last I checked I was in
Toronto...
Phillip Beauvoir wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is it possible to specify somewhere (the .genmodel?) that generated
> interfaces start with the letter "I" and the implementation classes do
> not have the suffix "...Impl"? So we can get "IFoobar" for the
> interface and "Foobar" for the class, following the pattern used in
> Eclipse code?
>
> BTW many thanks for EMF! The more I get into it, I see how powerful
> it is.
>
> Thanks,
>
> PB
Ed Merks
Professional Support: https://www.macromodeling.com/
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03809 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
