Home » Modeling » EMF » Validation component without eclipse
| Validation component without eclipse [message #411266] |
Fri, 20 July 2007 07:45  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: niclas.ericson.ecore.se
How can I use the Validation component without Eclipse= I`m writing a
simple console application.
I have defined my constraints in Java, I guess I need to load them myself
in some way.
|
|
| |
| Re: Validation component without eclipse [message #416739 is a reply to message #411287] |
Thu, 14 February 2008 19:04  |
 Vasanth Velusamy
Messages: 31
Registered: July 2009 |
Member |
|
|
Christian,
Question below.
Christian W. Damus wrote:
> Hi, Niclas,
>
> The EMF Validation Framework is designed to take advantage of the Eclipse
> Platform; it is required. If you need an Eclipse-free validation
> capability, you can use the EValidator API defined in core EMF:
>
> http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/indextools.cgi/*checkout*/org .eclipse.emf/doc/org.eclipse.emf.doc/references/overview/EMF .Validation.html
>
> Also, you might want to have a look at the attachment to the following
> bugzilla that proposes a rework of the EMF Validation Framework for
> Eclipse-free deployment. I haven't had a chance to review in detail what
> is required to adopt it, but it may help you:
>
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=167972
Is there a plan on including this feature (eclipse-free deployment) in
the next release?
Thanks,
Vasanth
>
> Cheers,
>
> Christian
>
>
> Niclas wrote:
>
>> How can I use the Validation component without Eclipse= I`m writing a
>> simple console application.
>> I have defined my constraints in Java, I guess I need to load them myself
>> in some way.
>
|
|
|
| Re: Validation component without eclipse [message #416742 is a reply to message #416739] |
Fri, 15 February 2008 00:47 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: cdamus.ca.ibm.com
Hi, Vasanth,
Currently, there is no plan to include this, no.
Christian
Vasanth Velusamy wrote:
> Christian,
>
> Question below.
>
> Christian W. Damus wrote:
>> Hi, Niclas,
>>
>> The EMF Validation Framework is designed to take advantage of the Eclipse
>> Platform; it is required. If you need an Eclipse-free validation
>> capability, you can use the EValidator API defined in core EMF:
>>
>>
http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/indextools.cgi/*checkout*/org .eclipse.emf/doc/org.eclipse.emf.doc/references/overview/EMF .Validation.html
>>
>> Also, you might want to have a look at the attachment to the following
>> bugzilla that proposes a rework of the EMF Validation Framework for
>> Eclipse-free deployment. I haven't had a chance to review in detail what
>> is required to adopt it, but it may help you:
>>
>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=167972
>
> Is there a plan on including this feature (eclipse-free deployment) in
> the next release?
>
> Thanks,
> Vasanth
>
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Christian
>>
>>
>> Niclas wrote:
>>
>>> How can I use the Validation component without Eclipse= I`m writing a
>>> simple console application.
>>> I have defined my constraints in Java, I guess I need to load them
>>> myself in some way.
>>
|
|
|
| Re: Validation component without eclipse [message #416760 is a reply to message #416742] |
Sun, 17 February 2008 18:07 |
Vasanth Velusamy
Messages: 31
Registered: July 2009 |
Member |
|
|
Christian,
Is it that the concept of using the validation framework stand-alone
doesn't align well with the focus of the workgroup or is it because of
lack of support/time/need/...?
If it is the latter, I could pitch in to get some work done on this (or
possibly Horacio Blanco, who reported Bug #167972, and provided some
patches earlier, if he is still interested?)
Thanks,
Vasanth
Christian W. Damus wrote:
> Hi, Vasanth,
>
> Currently, there is no plan to include this, no.
>
> Christian
>
> Vasanth Velusamy wrote:
>
>> Christian,
>>
>> Question below.
>>
>> Christian W. Damus wrote:
>>> Hi, Niclas,
>>>
>>> The EMF Validation Framework is designed to take advantage of the Eclipse
>>> Platform; it is required. If you need an Eclipse-free validation
>>> capability, you can use the EValidator API defined in core EMF:
>>>
>>>
> http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/indextools.cgi/*checkout*/org .eclipse.emf/doc/org.eclipse.emf.doc/references/overview/EMF .Validation.html
>>> Also, you might want to have a look at the attachment to the following
>>> bugzilla that proposes a rework of the EMF Validation Framework for
>>> Eclipse-free deployment. I haven't had a chance to review in detail what
>>> is required to adopt it, but it may help you:
>>>
>>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=167972
>> Is there a plan on including this feature (eclipse-free deployment) in
>> the next release?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vasanth
>>
>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>>
>>> Niclas wrote:
>>>
>>>> How can I use the Validation component without Eclipse= I`m writing a
>>>> simple console application.
>>>> I have defined my constraints in Java, I guess I need to load them
>>>> myself in some way.
>
|
|
|
| Re: Validation component without eclipse [message #416798 is a reply to message #416760] |
Tue, 19 February 2008 15:02 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: cdamus.ca.ibm.com
Hi, Vasanth,
Almost every aspect of the design of the EMF Validation Framework is geared
towards the Eclipse plug-in architecture. It is intended for an
environment in which multiple applications are deployed and integrated
externally by third parties, with constructs like client contexts and
constraint bindings to unravel the more complex scenarios of conflict
between multiple clients of the same models. In an RCP, these use cases
just don't seem very interesting.
The EValidator and related API in the EMF core should be sufficient for most
cases (even composing validators from different sources is not difficult).
Even the "live" mode offered by the Validation component is easily adapted
to an EValidator-based incremental validation of the objects affected by
Command execution.
Cheers,
Christian
Vasanth Velusamy wrote:
> Christian,
>
> Is it that the concept of using the validation framework stand-alone
> doesn't align well with the focus of the workgroup or is it because of
> lack of support/time/need/...?
>
> If it is the latter, I could pitch in to get some work done on this (or
> possibly Horacio Blanco, who reported Bug #167972, and provided some
> patches earlier, if he is still interested?)
>
> Thanks,
> Vasanth
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Fri Apr 26 09:20:13 GMT 2024
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02576 seconds |
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
