Eclipse Community Forums: Buckminster

Home » Archived » Buckminster » url.zipped

Tue, 21 July 2009 19:29

Eclipse User

Greetings folks,

When using a url.zipped reader - do you have to specify the
buckminster.component using a format at all?

I haven't been able to find documentation on this and am getting the
dreaded "Missing CSpec source required by component type osgi.bundle"
which I found indicated that I had screwed up the uri format for the
"local" reader.

I'm trying to configure chaining Hudson triggered builds that use
Buckminster to actually build. Each build depends on the output of the
previous ones using Hudson's url scheme to get the latest build artifacts
as a flat zip files containing binary plugins. Is this a legit way to go?

I also tried using Hudson's urls to deliver a p2 site and use the
eclipse.import reader, but the reader didn't seem to find anything in the
site.p2 directory generated by running the #site.p2 action on my feature.
Additionally, buckminster listsite reported no Features found as well.
Can I generate a legitimate p2 site by running only site.p2 on my feature
after resolving it?

-pete

Re: url.zipped [message #388012 is a reply to message #387969]

Wed, 22 July 2009 10:33

Eclipse User

The uri should point to a zip file that *is* the component in the format
specified by componentType.
I.e. you may want to use buckminster.component if your uri to the zip
file should contain the component name.

Did that help you?
- henrik

Peter M. Murray wrote:
>
> Greetings folks,
>
> When using a url.zipped reader - do you have to specify the
> buckminster.component using a format at all?
> I haven't been able to find documentation on this and am getting the
> dreaded "Missing CSpec source required by component type osgi.bundle"
> which I found indicated that I had screwed up the uri format for the
> "local" reader.
>
> I'm trying to configure chaining Hudson triggered builds that use
> Buckminster to actually build. Each build depends on the output of the
> previous ones using Hudson's url scheme to get the latest build
> artifacts as a flat zip files containing binary plugins. Is this a
> legit way to go?
>
> I also tried using Hudson's urls to deliver a p2 site and use the
> eclipse.import reader, but the reader didn't seem to find anything in
> the site.p2 directory generated by running the #site.p2 action on my
> feature. Additionally, buckminster listsite reported no Features found
> as well. Can I generate a legitimate p2 site by running only site.p2 on
> my feature after resolving it?
>
> -pete
>
>

Re: url.zipped [message #388016 is a reply to message #388012]

Wed, 22 July 2009 13:15

Eclipse User

Thank you, Henrik. Your response helped me realize that I really needed
to be using eclipse.import and a full p2 site to achieve my goal.

-pete

Previous Topic:	How do I use buckimster to build an RCP app
Next Topic:	site.p2 not exporting feature?

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

Current Time: Thu Jul 17 03:15:27 EDT 2025

.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Breadcrumbs

Sign up to our Newsletter