Qualifier Replacement with Local ReaderType [message #385775] |
Sun, 31 May 2009 23:47  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hello - I am using a local reader to type within my RMAP to load up an
existing checked out set of projects from subversion. The local reader
works great at resolving and bringing in the projects and the build works
fine except the qualifier is not replaced. I am using the following from
my buckminster properties:
qualifier.replacement.*=generator:lastRevision
generator.lastRevision.format=r{0,number,000000}
I understand I am not using the SVN readertype, but I do not think this
should matter since the local projects I am pointing to have SVN metadata
already and if I build a project on my workspace from scratch using SVN
checkout the qualifier replacement occurs properly. Anyone else have this
problem or know why this may work this way ?
Chase
|
|
|
Re: Qualifier Replacement with Local ReaderType [message #385776 is a reply to message #385775] |
Mon, 01 June 2009 01:30  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Chase,
Buckminster asks the Eclipse platform about information regarding what team provider that is used for managing the
source. If the source isn't checked out by Eclipse, there will be a null reply. So the scenario that you describe here
doesn't work.
Feel free to enter a bugzilla with an enhancement request.
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
Chase Wolfinger wrote:
> Hello - I am using a local reader to type within my RMAP to load up an
> existing checked out set of projects from subversion. The local reader
> works great at resolving and bringing in the projects and the build
> works fine except the qualifier is not replaced. I am using the
> following from my buckminster properties:
>
> qualifier.replacement.*=generator:lastRevision
> generator.lastRevision.format=r{0,number,000000}
>
> I understand I am not using the SVN readertype, but I do not think this
> should matter since the local projects I am pointing to have SVN
> metadata already and if I build a project on my workspace from scratch
> using SVN checkout the qualifier replacement occurs properly. Anyone
> else have this problem or know why this may work this way ?
>
> Chase
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03005 seconds