| Commit from more than one project [message #39144] |
Fri, 12 December 2008 12:37  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
I'm using FlexBuilder 3.2 with subversive. I recently updated my
subversive version to the latest and noticed something different when I
commit from the Team Synchronization. If I have changes from more than
one project, it used to put all the changes in one revision, now it makes
separate revisions for each project. Is this by design? Is there any way
to change it?
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Commit from more than one project [message #39239 is a reply to message #39208] |
Sun, 14 December 2008 13:18  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 19:44 +0000, demi wrote:
> Actually I'm not. I just changed to Native JavaHL (svn 1.5.4). The reason
> I changed was this. Currently, my server is at 1.4.x. As a test for
> another project I installed a 1.5.x server somewhere else. I had wanted
> to test the new merge stuff so I upgraded my TortoiseSVN to the latest
> version. That was a week or two ago. Then, just the other day, I was
> working on my eclipse project and I needed to do a merge. I generally do
> my merges from TortoiseSVN and not from eclipse. In any event, whatever
> TortoiseSVN did to my checked out files, eclipse had problems reading them
> (or I should say Subversive had problems). It told me that I needed to
> change my Connector to a compatible one. So I did. It was after that that
> I noticed the strange check-in issue.
>
> Is there anything good or bad about having the check-in in one revision?
> Maybe the new merge stuff doesn't work well that way? Any info would be
> greatly appreciated.
>
> I'm not really sure what the difference is between connectors. I guess I
> should research that. If you have anything to add that would be great.
When you updated SVN-tracked projects by tortoise - their metadata got
updated to 1.5 version. Of course, older connectors cannot handle new
one. Connectors of recent subversive builds are all 1.5-compatible, so
you can choose one that suits your needs. Here is short comparison of
connectors [1].
[1]
http://dev.eclipse.org/newslists/news.eclipse.technology.sub versive/msg00893.html
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03953 seconds
Home