Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Modeling » MDT (Model Development Tools) » [SBVR] Interest in UML/OCL to SBVR metamodel transformation
[SBVR] Interest in UML/OCL to SBVR metamodel transformation [message #378290] Fri, 11 April 2008 09:43 Go to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: jcabot.uoc.edu

I am working in a transformation from UML/OCL to SBVR specifications.

I am interested in implementing this transformation as a model-to-model
tranformation based on the UML/OCL and the new SBVR metamodel, when it
becomes available.

Jordi Cabot
Open University of Catalonia
www.lsi.upc.edu/~jcabot
jcabot@uoc.edu

Report message to a moderator

Re: [SBVR] Interest in UML/OCL to SBVR metamodel transformation [message #378293 is a reply to message #378290] Fri, 11 April 2008 16:53 Go to previous message
Dave Carlson is currently offline Dave CarlsonFriend
Messages: 402
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Hello Jordi,
Your work on UML/OCL to SBVR transformation is of keen interest to me and
your contributions are very welcome. I have an interest in applying this to
research I am doing in healthcare standards, specifically vocabulary and
constraints for patient health records.

I checked in the first version of the SBVR metamodel to CVS yesterday.
Please see the wiki pages for brief documentation:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/MDT-SBVR , especiallly the page links for metamodel
issues and metamodel modifications. Your feedback on usability of the
metamodel for transformation will be very important. The CMOF definition
published by OMG is quite difficult to work with in EMF due to the way they
model associations in CMOF.

Regards,
Dave Carlson

"Jordi Cabot" <jcabot@uoc.edu> wrote in message
news:ftnbs9$gdt$1@build.eclipse.org...
>I am working in a transformation from UML/OCL to SBVR specifications.
>
> I am interested in implementing this transformation as a model-to-model
> tranformation based on the UML/OCL and the new SBVR metamodel, when it
> becomes available.
>
> Jordi Cabot
> Open University of Catalonia
> www.lsi.upc.edu/~jcabot
> jcabot@uoc.edu
>
>
>

Report message to a moderator

Re: [SBVR] Interest in UML/OCL to SBVR metamodel transformation [message #592486 is a reply to message #378290] Fri, 11 April 2008 16:53 Go to previous message
Dave Carlson is currently offline Dave CarlsonFriend
Messages: 402
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Hello Jordi,
Your work on UML/OCL to SBVR transformation is of keen interest to me and
your contributions are very welcome. I have an interest in applying this to
research I am doing in healthcare standards, specifically vocabulary and
constraints for patient health records.

I checked in the first version of the SBVR metamodel to CVS yesterday.
Please see the wiki pages for brief documentation:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/MDT-SBVR , especiallly the page links for metamodel
issues and metamodel modifications. Your feedback on usability of the
metamodel for transformation will be very important. The CMOF definition
published by OMG is quite difficult to work with in EMF due to the way they
model associations in CMOF.

Regards,
Dave Carlson

"Jordi Cabot" <jcabot@uoc.edu> wrote in message
news:ftnbs9$gdt$1@build.eclipse.org...
>I am working in a transformation from UML/OCL to SBVR specifications.
>
> I am interested in implementing this transformation as a model-to-model
> tranformation based on the UML/OCL and the new SBVR metamodel, when it
> becomes available.
>
> Jordi Cabot
> Open University of Catalonia
> www.lsi.upc.edu/~jcabot
> jcabot@uoc.edu
>
>
>

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:Using UML Standard profile with static profile
Next Topic:[Announcement] Eclipse/OMG Symposium at the OMG Technical Meeting in Ottawa
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ]

Current Time: Thu Apr 26 21:32:54 GMT 2018

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.01657 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software