| [SBVR] Interest in UML/OCL to SBVR metamodel transformation [message #378290] |
Fri, 11 April 2008 05:43  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: jcabot.uoc.edu
I am working in a transformation from UML/OCL to SBVR specifications.
I am interested in implementing this transformation as a model-to-model
tranformation based on the UML/OCL and the new SBVR metamodel, when it
becomes available.
Jordi Cabot
Open University of Catalonia
www.lsi.upc.edu/~jcabot
jcabot@uoc.edu
|
|
|
| Re: [SBVR] Interest in UML/OCL to SBVR metamodel transformation [message #378293 is a reply to message #378290] |
Fri, 11 April 2008 12:53  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hello Jordi,
Your work on UML/OCL to SBVR transformation is of keen interest to me and
your contributions are very welcome. I have an interest in applying this to
research I am doing in healthcare standards, specifically vocabulary and
constraints for patient health records.
I checked in the first version of the SBVR metamodel to CVS yesterday.
Please see the wiki pages for brief documentation:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/MDT-SBVR , especiallly the page links for metamodel
issues and metamodel modifications. Your feedback on usability of the
metamodel for transformation will be very important. The CMOF definition
published by OMG is quite difficult to work with in EMF due to the way they
model associations in CMOF.
Regards,
Dave Carlson
"Jordi Cabot" <jcabot@uoc.edu> wrote in message
news:ftnbs9$gdt$1@build.eclipse.org...
>I am working in a transformation from UML/OCL to SBVR specifications.
>
> I am interested in implementing this transformation as a model-to-model
> tranformation based on the UML/OCL and the new SBVR metamodel, when it
> becomes available.
>
> Jordi Cabot
> Open University of Catalonia
> www.lsi.upc.edu/~jcabot
> jcabot@uoc.edu
>
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: [SBVR] Interest in UML/OCL to SBVR metamodel transformation [message #592486 is a reply to message #378290] |
Fri, 11 April 2008 12:53 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hello Jordi,
Your work on UML/OCL to SBVR transformation is of keen interest to me and
your contributions are very welcome. I have an interest in applying this to
research I am doing in healthcare standards, specifically vocabulary and
constraints for patient health records.
I checked in the first version of the SBVR metamodel to CVS yesterday.
Please see the wiki pages for brief documentation:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/MDT-SBVR , especiallly the page links for metamodel
issues and metamodel modifications. Your feedback on usability of the
metamodel for transformation will be very important. The CMOF definition
published by OMG is quite difficult to work with in EMF due to the way they
model associations in CMOF.
Regards,
Dave Carlson
"Jordi Cabot" <jcabot@uoc.edu> wrote in message
news:ftnbs9$gdt$1@build.eclipse.org...
>I am working in a transformation from UML/OCL to SBVR specifications.
>
> I am interested in implementing this transformation as a model-to-model
> tranformation based on the UML/OCL and the new SBVR metamodel, when it
> becomes available.
>
> Jordi Cabot
> Open University of Catalonia
> www.lsi.upc.edu/~jcabot
> jcabot@uoc.edu
>
>
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03754 seconds
Home