|
Re: Problems generating an update site [message #378251 is a reply to message #378249] |
Wed, 02 July 2008 17:56 |
|
Hi Chris,
No there are no restrictions on plug-in names. Do you by any chance have
an include or exclude pattern in the cspec build action for your site?
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
Chris Butt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using Buckminster to build a set of Eclipse
> plugins/features/updatesite. Everything appears to be compiling and
> building fine, however, some plugins are missing on my generated update
> site.
>
> I have two features that I'm trying to create an update site for, both
> contain a number of plugins that have a variety of names. The problem
> I'm seeing is only the plugins whose names have the same prefix as the
> update site and/or included features are appearing on my update site.
> (ie. my update site project starts with com.iona, same with the included
> features, only the plugins that start with com.iona are included in my
> update site) I am including a bunch of third party plugins as well that
> are not packaged into the update site (ie. org.apache.*)
> Is there a restriction in buckminster on the plugin names that an update
> site can include? Is it possible that I am missing some configuration
> somewhere?
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
>
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02430 seconds