|
| Re: Building an update site [message #378253 is a reply to message #378247] |
Wed, 02 July 2008 18:02   |
|
Hi Florian,
Just to make sure. Do you have two features that explicitly include
these fragments using an explicit version?
Which component is it that requires the 1.0.2 launcher? Does it specify
a perfect match or can it be satisfied with the 1.0.3 launcher? The
reason I ask is if its the latter, Buckminster will consider the 1.0.2
launcher redundant and skip it.
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
DI Florian Hackenberger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> While searching for a solution to my previous question 'Maintaining a
> feature/bundle repository for buckminster', I came to the conclusion that
> the reason for the non-working update site produced by buckminster, which
> lead me to asking the question in the first place, is probably a bug.
>
> I'm building an update site from a number of features. One feature includes
> the org.eclipse.rcp and the org.eclipse.equinox.executable feature. The
> buckminster installation consists of a directory /build/buckminster which
> contains the headless buckminster along with the org.eclipse.rcp feature
> and some others required for query resolution (subclipse etc.). The
> directory /share/eclipse contains a standard eclipse installation with all
> the required build dependencies. The features org.eclipse.rcp and
> org.eclipse.equinox.executable are at the same version in both 'features'
> directories. However, buckminster 'forgets' to include some fragments in
> the update site. It includes an older version of
> org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.gtk.linux.x86:
> org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.gtk.linux.x86_1.0.2.R331_v20071 019
> but not the
> org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.gtk.linux.x86_1.0.3.R33x_v20080 118
> which is required by the org.eclipse.rcp feature it includes in the update
> site and which is present in both /share/eclipse/plugins as well
> as /build/buckminster/plugins.
>
> Could there be something I overlooked or misunderstood?
>
> Cheers,
> Florian
>
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Building an update site [message #378414 is a reply to message #378410] |
Mon, 07 July 2008 17:35 |
|
Hi Florian.
I'm on vacation now with very limited bandwidth. I'll have to get back to you on this when I get
back on Tuesday 15.
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
DI Florian Hackenberger wrote:
> Any suggestions in which direction I could investigate?
>
> Cheers,
> Florian
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Building an update site [message #378579 is a reply to message #378578] |
Tue, 22 July 2008 13:43 |
|
Hi Florian,
I don't think that bugfix till resolve your problem since I suspect it
in some way is related to the way we collect fragments to include in the
build. I have a hunch that we never include more then one version of a
fragment.
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
DI Florian Hackenberger wrote:
> Thomas Hallgren wrote:
>> I'm on vacation now with very limited bandwidth. I'll have to get back to
>> you on this when I get back on Tuesday 15.
>
> Could the bugfix:
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=240783
> be a fix for the problem I found?
>
> Cheers,
> Florian
>
>
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03640 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
