| is planning to use GEF "safe" ? [message #3285] |
Mon, 20 May 2002 13:47  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
I need a diagramming component for an editor plugin I'm developing. I
was planning to use a third party ActiveX component when GEF was
announced. Based on my initial evaluation of GEF, I would be inclined
to use it instead. However I'm concerned about the timing, since GEF is
still in the proposal phase. Do I need to wait until GEF is past the
proposal phase before it's safe to assume that it will become part of
Eclipse? Is there a schedule for it's inclusion in Eclpise? Are there
any issues with the stability of the code at this stage?
Thanks,
David
|
|
|
|
| Re: is planning to use GEF "safe" ? [message #3417 is a reply to message #3319] |
Tue, 21 May 2002 09:24  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: John_Duimovich.oti.com
Randy is correct,
If I wasn't travelling and missing my web update tools, I would have fixed
the web pages by now <g>
John Duimovich
"Randy Hudson" <none@ibm.com> wrote in message
news:acbcmn$7h7$1@rogue.oti.com...
> I believe that GEF is past the proposal stage since there is this
newsgroup
> and CVS home for GEF.
>
> All projects under the "Tools" heading will not be included in the Eclipse
> base.
>
> The code is stable.
>
> "David Dean" <david.dean@chordiant.com> wrote in message
> news:3CE936A9.2040807@chordiant.com...
> > I need a diagramming component for an editor plugin I'm developing. I
> > was planning to use a third party ActiveX component when GEF was
> > announced. Based on my initial evaluation of GEF, I would be inclined
> > to use it instead. However I'm concerned about the timing, since GEF is
> > still in the proposal phase. Do I need to wait until GEF is past the
> > proposal phase before it's safe to assume that it will become part of
> > Eclipse? Is there a schedule for it's inclusion in Eclpise? Are there
> > any issues with the stability of the code at this stage?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > David
> >
>
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02491 seconds
Home