Adding Interpreter without any libraries [message #37899] |
Thu, 04 June 2009 02:24  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi,
I am using eclipse 3.4.1 with S1.0M4 DLTK .
In my IDE whenever we add a new interpreter (fssdbg.exe) through
interpreter preference page,it throws an expception "Failed to resolve
library locations for fssdbg.exe " and gives stack trace for
"java.lang.Exception: Output:".
Here we observed that whenever we add an interpreter it tries to run the
file returned by method "createPathFile" of
AbstractInterpreterInstallType and try to resolve the library locations.
but in our case we require no libraries with our interpreter.Is there any
mechanism by which we can remove this library resolving part or handle the
errors if no libraries found?
Please Help
Regards
Sheela
|
|
|
Re: Adding Interpreter without any libraries [message #37933 is a reply to message #37899] |
Thu, 04 June 2009 03:29  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Sheela,
E.g. you can override
public synchronized LibraryLocation[] getDefaultLibraryLocations( final
IFileHandle installLocation,
EnvironmentVariable[] variables,
IProgressMonitor monitor)
and return empty array.
I think this DLTK part should be improved, but most probably it would
happen after 1.0 release.
Regards,
Alex
Sheela wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using eclipse 3.4.1 with S1.0M4 DLTK .
>
> In my IDE whenever we add a new interpreter (fssdbg.exe) through
> interpreter preference page,it throws an expception "Failed to resolve
> library locations for fssdbg.exe " and gives stack trace for
> "java.lang.Exception: Output:".
>
> Here we observed that whenever we add an interpreter it tries to run the
> file returned by method "createPathFile" of
> AbstractInterpreterInstallType and try to resolve the library locations.
>
> but in our case we require no libraries with our interpreter.Is there
> any mechanism by which we can remove this library resolving part or
> handle the errors if no libraries found?
>
> Please Help
>
> Regards
> Sheela
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.35326 seconds