|
| Re: Papyrus for Manufacturing (P4M) [message #1867662 is a reply to message #1867632] |
Wed, 03 July 2024 05:33   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hello, could you please describe the "PSV qualifier" more?
From what I understand, you want to add more information to a capability of the Capability submodel, right? In that case, as the definition of a capability in the AAS standard is not enough detail, we have to keep the capability's properties design form generic. Thus, for this P4M current version, if you want to add more information to a capability, you could temporarily put it in the Description field. In the future version, we will specify a capability according to the update of the AAS standard.
Attachment: example.png
(Size: 58.29KB, Downloaded 65 times)
|
|
|
| Re: Papyrus for Manufacturing (P4M) [message #1867791 is a reply to message #1867662] |
Sun, 07 July 2024 16:18 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hello,
Thank you for your response. I would like to clarify my question regarding the PVS (Property Value Statement) qualifier. In the context of the Asset Administration Shell (AAS) and specifically the Capability submodel, a PVS qualifier is used to describe additional attributes of a capability, such as requirements, assurances, offers, and measurements. This is important for capability matching during runtime in a production environment.
In the research paper I am referring to, PVS qualifiers such as ExpressionSemantic and PredicateRelation are used to provide more detailed information about capabilities. Here is an example of how these qualifiers are structured:
ExpressionSemantic: This describes the semantic meaning of the capability, such as requirement, assurance, offer, etc.
PredicateRelation: This describes the relationship, such as greater, smaller, equal, etc.
Value: The actual value associated with the capability.
Currently, I am looking for a way to annotate these PVS qualifiers directly in the P4M AAS designer, as it's already been done in the attached research paper's use case.
Thanks for your assistance.
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.07588 seconds
Home