Eclipse Community Forums: Newcomers » Why does Neon1 start empty tomcat9 900ms while Oxygen and Photon start it need 20000ms?

Home » Newcomers » Newcomers » Why does Neon1 start empty tomcat9 900ms while Oxygen and Photon start it need 20000ms?(Same laptop and only the difference is Eclipse version.)

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

Why does Neon1 start empty tomcat9 900ms while Oxygen and Photon start it need 20000ms? [message #1792691]

Sun, 22 July 2018 03:31

qingy zhang

Messages: 3
Registered: July 2018

Junior Member

Same laptop and only the difference is Eclipse version.

win10 - i5 7300HQ - 8G

I found the starting process in console mainly stop seconds after showing message in these 5 places.

1.Deploying web application directory [D:\mine\doc\apache-tomcat-9.0.10\webapps\docs]

2.Deploying web application directory [D:\mine\doc\apache-tomcat-9.0.10\webapps\examples]

3.Deploying web application directory [D:\mine\doc\apache-tomcat-9.0.10\webapps\host-manager]

4.Deploying web application directory [D:\mine\doc\apache-tomcat-9.0.10\webapps\manager]

5.Deploying web application directory [D:\mine\doc\apache-tomcat-9.0.10\webapps\ROOT]

Version: Photon Release (4.8.0) Server startup in 22290 ms

BUT Neon1's Tomcat starting process won't stop 1 second at those 5 places.

Version: Neon.1 Release (4.6.1) Server startup in 932 ms

I want to use latest verson of Eclipse but I cant find a solution to this issue.Could someone help me with it?Thanks a Lot.

[Updated on: Sun, 22 July 2018 05:37]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Why does Neon1 start empty tomcat9 900ms while Oxygen and Photon start it need 20000ms? [message #1792694 is a reply to message #1792691]

Sun, 22 July 2018 08:39

Ed Merks

Messages: 29482
Registered: July 2009

Senior Member

It might be best to ask on the Web Tools forum

https://www.eclipse.org/forums/eclipse.webtools

Or to open a problem report using

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/enter_bug.cgi?product=WTP%20ServerTools

Of course in the case of a problem report, an actual test case that reproduces the problem would be a good thing.

Report message to a moderator