new Mercurial client? [message #1744922] |
Sun, 02 October 2016 17:25  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi,
The MercurialEclipse plugin appears to be totally dead -- no updates for 4 years, and no responses to bug reports. I was wondering how hard it would be to split off the eGit core into some kind of "Eclipse DVCS" project and build eGit and a Mercurial client off of it (as well as maybe for other DVCS's?).
Thanks!
Ari
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: new Mercurial client? [message #1745064 is a reply to message #1745014] |
Tue, 04 October 2016 13:46   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Thanks for the details, Christian. I still think it would be worthwhile investigating what common core could be extracted from eGit. It's strange to me that, in the spirit of Eclipse, which exposes such a generic Team Provider interface, we can't put together some generic foundation for DVCS's. I don't know much about Bazaar, darcs, etc., but at least there should be much commonality that could be exploited between Git and Mercurial.
Obviously, Git dominates the DVCS mindshare now, with GitHub, etc., but there are innumerable open source projects using Mercurial, including Mozilla and OpenJDK, and many companies using it, including https://code.facebook.com/posts/218678814984400/scaling-mercurial-at-facebook/ . Why we can't have a first-class Team Provider for Mercurial, aside from lack of resources, is beyond me.
|
|
|
|
Re: new Mercurial client? [message #1746446 is a reply to message #1746420] |
Fri, 28 October 2016 22:42   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Thanks, Matthias. I had first looked here: https://marketplace.eclipse.org/content/mercurialeclipse , and it looks pretty bleak. I used the tool several years ago, and it was buggy, as many have mentioned. It certainly doesn't get the industry support that I assume eGit gets, or at least community, developers, and mindshare. I guess I still don't understand how a tool like eGit, for which I have to presume a very high percentage of the code is for the UI, can't share that UI code. The underlying DVCS calls would obviously be completely different, but conceptually, they are incredibly similar tools, and I would presume that much of the Eclipse UI code could be shared. Am I completely off here?
|
|
|
|
Re: new Mercurial client? [message #1750186 is a reply to message #1749105] |
Fri, 16 December 2016 20:42  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Thanks, Matthias (guess I forgot to click to get notified on this topic again). If Andrey really thinks all that UI code can't be shared, then I won't push it. Without knowing either codebase, it still doesn't seem to make a lot of sense to me, intuitively.
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.05621 seconds