Skip to main content



      Home
Home » Eclipse Projects » Oomph » Default value for unsigned content?
Default value for unsigned content? [message #1721749] Fri, 29 January 2016 13:02 Go to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Is there a way to set the unsignedPolicy to ACCEPT by default during a product install?
Re: Default value for unsigned content? [message #1721784 is a reply to message #1721749] Sat, 30 January 2016 06:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Maybe the option described in
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=391399 works...

On 29.01.2016 19:02, Min Idzelis wrote:
> Is there a way to set the unsignedPolicy to ACCEPT by default during a
> product install?
Re: Default value for unsigned content? [message #1721906 is a reply to message #1721784] Mon, 01 February 2016 10:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
I added eclipse.p2.unsignedPolicy=allow to the installer's config.ini and this works for me.

Its odd that the installer is using this value to check for the prompt, instead of the fact that I have a eclipse.ini task in my product setup that sets this preference. It appears that installing unsigned content is controlled differently if its being done via the installer, vs the running target.

Just food for thought.
Re: Default value for unsigned content? [message #1721915 is a reply to message #1721906] Mon, 01 February 2016 11:27 Go to previous message
Eclipse UserFriend
Min,

Comments below.

On 01.02.2016 16:34, Min Idzelis wrote:
> I added eclipse.p2.unsignedPolicy=allow to the installer's config.ini
> and this works for me.
> Its odd that the installer is using this value to check for the
> prompt, instead of the fact that I have a eclipse.ini task in my
> product setup that sets this preference.
It's p2 that's doing the checking in the running application.
> It appears that installing unsigned content is controlled differently
> if its being done via the installer, vs the running target.
No, it's done the same way by p2, but of course in one case the
application is the installer itself and in the other case it's the
running installation.
> Just food for thought.
Previous Topic:What is the PathVariableTask supposed to do?
Next Topic:Assign project streams to product versions
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Jul 15 06:53:11 EDT 2025

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03888 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top