|
|
| Re: How to add an Artifact to an Activity Diagram [message #1714185 is a reply to message #1714183] |
Tue, 10 November 2015 14:51   |
|
Hi Luis,
as far as I know, Artefact modeling element is not part of Activity diagram concepts and that is the reason why Papyrus does not show it.
Some tools allow this kind of "mismatch" but not Papyrus that is quite good in conformance with the specification.
Artefact is a concept of deployment diagram. That is the kind of diagram you can use to see it.
Best regards
Raphaël
|
|
|
| Re: How to add an Artifact to an Activity Diagram [message #1714188 is a reply to message #1714185] |
Tue, 10 November 2015 14:57 |
|
Indeed, the Model Explorer provides an action for creation of Artifacts
as nested classifiers. Because all Behaviors (such as Activity) are a
kind of Class, they can own nested classifiers. But, it doesn't make
sense for behaviors to have nested classifiers, does it? It seems to
me that there are many features of a Class that don't make sense for
Behaviors (they can be active and own a classifier-behavior, too!).
Christian
On 2015-11-10 14:51:14 +0000, Raphael Faudou said:
> Hi Luis,
>
> as far as I know, Artefact modeling element is not part of Activity
> diagram concepts and that is the reason why Papyrus does not show it.
> Some tools allow this kind of "mismatch" but not Papyrus that is quite
> good in conformance with the specification.
>
> Artefact is a concept of deployment diagram. That is the kind of
> diagram you can use to see it.
>
> Best regards
> Raphaël
|
|
|
|
| Re: How to add an Artifact to an Activity Diagram [message #1714207 is a reply to message #1714189] |
Tue, 10 November 2015 17:54 |
|
Yep! Toaster fridges for everyone! The Way of the Future™.
cW
On 2015-11-10 15:25:14 +0000, Camille Letavernier said:
> Quote:
>> It seems to
>> me that there are many features of a Class that don't make sense for
>> Behaviors (they can be active and own a classifier-behavior, too!).
>
>
> I think that's because the spec. says that "If a behavior doesn't have
> a context, then it is its own context". So it may have its own
> Structure, etc.
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.01777 seconds
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
