Skip to main content


Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Eclipse Projects » EclipseLink » EclipseLink concept documentation for the query result cache possibly outdated.(There might be a discrepancy between the implementation since 2.5 and the cache concept documentation. If this kind of issue should be raised somewhere else, please let me know.)
EclipseLink concept documentation for the query result cache possibly outdated. [message #1705019] Tue, 11 August 2015 13:28
Andreas Schmidt is currently offline Andreas SchmidtFriend
Messages: 33
Registered: July 2009
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Member
Still investigating the stale cache issue mentioned in topic another topic (https://www.eclipse.org/forums/index.php/m/1704012/#msg_1704012), I came across the conceptional introduction of the query result cache in https://www.eclipse.org/eclipselink/documentation/2.6/concepts/cache008.htm which is identical for release 2.4, 2.5 and 2.6.

The design document https://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseLink/DesignDocs/398411 mentions, that "A option will be added to invalidate the query results cache, this will be enabled by default." while the concept page states: "The query results cache does not pick up committed changes from the application as the object cache does..."

Looking at the bug report https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=352500 and its successor https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=398193, they both have the fix version 2.5 and are marked as FIXED.

Should the conceptual documentation of the query result cache be updated and is there some additional information available regarding the changes in the design document (https://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseLink/DesignDocs/398411), ie. the name of the option?

Thank you and best regards
Previous Topic:[Moxy] Bean validation is not working if current class has no annoated fields
Next Topic:Slow factory.createEntityManager() with EcliseLink
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Mar 07 21:49:26 GMT 2021

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.01441 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top