Skip to main content


Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Eclipse Projects » Buckminster dev » Fwd: Re: is git.auto.fetch implemented at all?
Fwd: Re: is git.auto.fetch implemented at all? [message #1691054] Wed, 01 April 2015 21:46
Ed Willink is currently offline Ed WillinkFriend
Messages: 5930
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: is git.auto.fetch implemented at all?
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 17:13:21 +0000
From: Ed Willink <ed@xxxxxxxx.uk>
Organization: EclipseCorner
Newsgroups: eclipse.tools.buckminster
References: <la4ao4$j8d$1@xxxxxxxxe.org>
<lbj6tl$a5k$1@xxxxxxxxe.org> <lc7rvi$jp4$2@xxxxxxxxe.org>
<m0rndi$kt8$1@xxxxxxxxe.org>



Hi

Ping. Anyone able to comment?

Regards

Ed Willink

On 05/10/2014 16:16, Ed Willink wrote:
> Hi
>
> What is the status of this?
>
> I appear to need to delete my Hudson Workspace to get a GIT 'refresh'.
> Searching comes up with this correspondence.
>
> On my Hudson HIPP I appear to have only the choice of Buckminster 4.2 so
> perhaps 4.3 or 4.4 may have already fixed it.
>
> But when I look at
>
> https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/tools.buckminster/governance
>
> I see that the current version of Buckminster is 2.0.0 perhaps released
> 18 months ago but if so without a release review. No plans for further
> releases.
>
> I'm really confused. What is the best Buckminster version and does it
> fix the GIT refresh problem?
>
> Regards
>
> Ed Willink
>
> On 28/01/2014 09:06, Lorenzo Bettini wrote:
>> On 20/01/2014 14:04, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
>>> On 2014-01-02 19:21, Lorenzo Bettini wrote:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> Is git.auto.fetch considered during materialization?
>>>>
>>> Not really. That functionality was written as part of the first
>>> incarnation of the git support feature. I didn't know enough about git
>>> to do a proper evaluation for a requirement spec. My current
>>> recommendation would be to not use it. If someone has the time to look
>>> into how this should be implemented properly, then I'd be very
>>> interested in reviewing a patch. One thing that comes to mind
>>> immediately is that the auto.fetch should be called auto.pull (since
>>> that's what it was intended as).
>>
>> OK, I'll submit a bug and see whether I can come up with something :)
>>
>> cheers
>> Lorenzo
>>
>
Previous Topic:[buckminster-dev] Does it matter to &quot;Buckminster&quot; which VM is used for &quot;c
Next Topic:[buckminster-dev] Fwd: Build XText with ant
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Jun 24 09:36:29 GMT 2018

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.01647 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top