| The configured runtime is insufficient to provide an implementation for JAXB 2.2 [message #1690312] |
Thu, 26 March 2015 10:36  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
I have Eclipse Luna with the latest updates, and I am running on Linux (Debian sid) with openjdk-8.
I created a Dynamic Web project, and tried to add the JAX-B facet, but I get an error message saying that "The currently selected JAXB library provider is invalid". SO in the properties I go to JAXB and select Generic JAXB 2.2 expecting to use the JAXB implimentation in the JRE. But when I select the JRE as the source I get the message "The configured runtime is insufficient to provide an implementation for JAXB 2.2". According to the JAX-RI documentation, JAXB 2.2 should be in Java-8.
I have tried Generic 2.1 but I get the same error.
Any ideas how to solve this?
|
|
|
|
| Re: The configured runtime is insufficient to provide an implementation for JAXB 2.2 [message #1690330 is a reply to message #1690322] |
Thu, 26 March 2015 12:05  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Neil Hauge wrote on Thu, 26 March 2015 11:16There must be a bug in the way Dali is interrogating the Java 8 runtime for JAXB 2.2 compliance. I would file a bug against Dali for this so it can be fixed in the upcoming Mars release, and possibly be put into a Luna maintenance release.
For now, you should be able to workaround the issue by disabling library configuration, which really just turns off this validation. It assumes your library is correct based on your specific configuration, and everything should work fine, assuming it is.
Neil
Looking in the Bug tracker, this looks like https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=437635 but that says it is already there - or am I misreading it?
The problem is that it generates an error saying that "the currently selected JAX-B library provider is invalid", and it will not let me enable the JAX-B Facet.
If this version hasnot been released yet, is there a way to download a development version and load that? If not when is this due to hit the streets?
David
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03854 seconds
Home