| AJDT - our plan. [message #32457] |
Fri, 02 April 2004 03:53  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: clemas.uk.ibm.com
Hi,
We know AOSD 2004 at Lancaster has come and gone. Where is AJDT? I
wanted to spell out our strategy for the next few weeks.
This is as per Adrians post just now on aspectj-users:
AspectJ 1.2 is imminent - a release candidate will be out inside the next
week as long as there are no surprises. We've had a brief AJDT discussion
here in Hursley, and we're going to change out plans a little. Next week
we will build a version of AJDT that works on 3.0M8, incorporating the 1.2
compiler. This version will be based on the current AJDT codebase (i.e.
not Lancaster) but will provide a solution for users whilst waiting for
the new generation of AJDT to be released.
Andy
---
Andy Clement
AspectJ/AJDT Development.
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: AJDT - our plan. [message #32561 is a reply to message #32527] |
Tue, 06 April 2004 19:44  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Andy,
Any chance of getting a mail-to-news gateway set up if that's the case?
Ian.
Andy Clement wrote:
> Guillaume Pothier wrote:
>
>
>>Thanks for the feedback! What about Lancaster?
>>Guillaume
>
>
> We have no date for final release but we have a codebase that is almost
> ready to put out in some form on CVS for those desperate to try it.
>
> Today I am doing some final testing on the 3.0m8 AJDT (1.1.7) which is
> looking good.
>
> I should also add that the team here are more responsive to emails to the
> AJDT mailing list than the newsgroup. That's because we have to remember
> to check the newsgroup - so it can be a while between posts from us ...
> sorry about that !
>
> cheers,
> Andy.
>
--
#ifndef __COMMON_SENSE__ | Ian Phillips
#include <std_disclaimer> | TIBCO Software Inc.
#endif | www.tibco.com
|
|
|
| Re: AJDT - our plan. [message #576934 is a reply to message #32457] |
Fri, 02 April 2004 10:40 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Thanks for the feedback! What about Lancaster?
Guillaume
Andy Clement wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We know AOSD 2004 at Lancaster has come and gone. Where is AJDT? I
> wanted to spell out our strategy for the next few weeks.
>
> This is as per Adrians post just now on aspectj-users:
>
> AspectJ 1.2 is imminent - a release candidate will be out inside the next
> week as long as there are no surprises. We've had a brief AJDT discussion
> here in Hursley, and we're going to change out plans a little. Next week
> we will build a version of AJDT that works on 3.0M8, incorporating the 1.2
> compiler. This version will be based on the current AJDT codebase (i.e.
> not Lancaster) but will provide a solution for users whilst waiting for
> the new generation of AJDT to be released.
>
> Andy
>
> ---
> Andy Clement
> AspectJ/AJDT Development.
>
|
|
|
| Re: AJDT - our plan. [message #576953 is a reply to message #32492] |
Tue, 06 April 2004 09:23 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Guillaume Pothier wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback! What about Lancaster?
> Guillaume
We have no date for final release but we have a codebase that is almost
ready to put out in some form on CVS for those desperate to try it.
Today I am doing some final testing on the 3.0m8 AJDT (1.1.7) which is
looking good.
I should also add that the team here are more responsive to emails to the
AJDT mailing list than the newsgroup. That's because we have to remember
to check the newsgroup - so it can be a while between posts from us ...
sorry about that !
cheers,
Andy.
|
|
|
| Re: AJDT - our plan. [message #576971 is a reply to message #32527] |
Tue, 06 April 2004 19:44 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Andy,
Any chance of getting a mail-to-news gateway set up if that's the case?
Ian.
Andy Clement wrote:
> Guillaume Pothier wrote:
>
>
>>Thanks for the feedback! What about Lancaster?
>>Guillaume
>
>
> We have no date for final release but we have a codebase that is almost
> ready to put out in some form on CVS for those desperate to try it.
>
> Today I am doing some final testing on the 3.0m8 AJDT (1.1.7) which is
> looking good.
>
> I should also add that the team here are more responsive to emails to the
> AJDT mailing list than the newsgroup. That's because we have to remember
> to check the newsgroup - so it can be a while between posts from us ...
> sorry about that !
>
> cheers,
> Andy.
>
--
#ifndef __COMMON_SENSE__ | Ian Phillips
#include <std_disclaimer> | TIBCO Software Inc.
#endif | www.tibco.com
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04219 seconds
Home