Home » Archived » DSDP - Mobile Tools for Java (MTJ) » Build state machine has not been initialized
| | | | | |
Re: Build state machine has not been initialized [message #33427 is a reply to message #32424] |
Sun, 26 July 2009 02:42 |
Diego Tognola Messages: 14 Registered: July 2009 |
Junior Member |
|
|
Just out of interest - how are you using AspectJ in a JME world ?
You may want to look into AspectME as well, pretty cool stuff that
allows you to weave JME apps.
Cheers,
Diego
Victor Llorens wrote:
> Thanks for your answres David,
>
> Your are right, amb doing those steps. Even more, if I remove AspectJ
> from the classpath project does not compile.
>
> Dunno if it is fault of the preferifyer step or the package builder one.
> Maybe this is the main problem.
> Do you know if MTJ fills an error log?
>
>> What do you mean with the paragraph bellow ??
>
>>> By the way, in the builders preference page, I can see how the number
>>> of "package builder"(s) checkboxs is increasing as I make changes in
>>> the configuration.
>
> It's something derived after I got the errors. It's like every time I
> reproduce the error, a new package builder appears in the list. And I
> think it's not normal behaviour.
>
> Thanks,
> Víctor LLorens
>
>
>
|
|
| | | | | |
Re: Build state machine has not been initialized [message #575424 is a reply to message #32424] |
Sun, 26 July 2009 02:42 |
Diego Tognola Messages: 14 Registered: July 2009 |
Junior Member |
|
|
Just out of interest - how are you using AspectJ in a JME world ?
You may want to look into AspectME as well, pretty cool stuff that
allows you to weave JME apps.
Cheers,
Diego
Victor Llorens wrote:
> Thanks for your answres David,
>
> Your are right, amb doing those steps. Even more, if I remove AspectJ
> from the classpath project does not compile.
>
> Dunno if it is fault of the preferifyer step or the package builder one.
> Maybe this is the main problem.
> Do you know if MTJ fills an error log?
>
>> What do you mean with the paragraph bellow ??
>
>>> By the way, in the builders preference page, I can see how the number
>>> of "package builder"(s) checkboxs is increasing as I make changes in
>>> the configuration.
>
> It's something derived after I got the errors. It's like every time I
> reproduce the error, a new package builder appears in the list. And I
> think it's not normal behaviour.
>
> Thanks,
> Víctor LLorens
>
>
>
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Tue Sep 24 05:39:06 GMT 2024
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.05506 seconds
|