PDT 1.0 M1 much slower while editing ? [message #31462] |
Mon, 25 June 2007 04:43  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
I'm new to this newsgroup so at first, hello to everybody.
I'm following the PDT project since a few month and using it every day for
my work processes, it's a great project.
I seen big differences between the 0.7 RC3 and the 1.0 M1, a lot of
improvements of course, but also I noticed that the editing process was
much slower... Moving within the source code and editing some parts are
incredibly slower than in the previous release...
I don't know where does this problem come from but it's quite annoying...
:/
On the other hand, I noticed that the "PHP building project" when opening
a project withing Eclipse is going faster than in previous releases.
If someone has a tip to make PDT a bit faster with this release... Or if I
should wait for the next milestone build...
Best.
|
|
|
|
|
Re: PDT 1.0 M1 much slower while editing ? [message #34481 is a reply to message #31462] |
Sun, 08 July 2007 06:28  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
This issue was fixed for the next release
--
Guy Gurfinkel,
Team Leader, Development Tools
Zend.
"Bruce Heller" <bheller@bheller.com> wrote in message
news:96d99da969189e2194093a15aeb314c8$1@www.eclipse.org...
> I'm new to this newsgroup so at first, hello to everybody.
>
> I'm following the PDT project since a few month and using it every day for
> my work processes, it's a great project.
>
> I seen big differences between the 0.7 RC3 and the 1.0 M1, a lot of
> improvements of course, but also I noticed that the editing process was
> much slower... Moving within the source code and editing some parts are
> incredibly slower than in the previous release...
> I don't know where does this problem come from but it's quite annoying...
> :/
>
> On the other hand, I noticed that the "PHP building project" when opening
> a project withing Eclipse is going faster than in previous releases.
>
> If someone has a tip to make PDT a bit faster with this release... Or if I
> should wait for the next milestone build...
>
> Best.
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.26461 seconds