Skip to main content


Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Eclipse Projects » Remote Application Platform (RAP) » RAP ready for business use?
icon5.gif  RAP ready for business use? [message #495312] Wed, 04 November 2009 14:57 Go to next message
Shonof  is currently offline Shonof Friend
Messages: 5
Registered: November 2009
Junior Member
We want to change our current framework to the RAP framework. I want to know if RAP is stable/safe enough for business use.

I hope someone can help me.
Re: RAP ready for business use? [message #495537 is a reply to message #495312] Thu, 05 November 2009 09:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Stefan   is currently offline Stefan Friend
Messages: 316
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Hi,

we use RAP for many years now and have build very complex business
applications using this technology [1].

For me there are two big advantages compared to other web frameworks:
- Very rich desktop like UI
- Good modularity through OSGi on the server side

Of course there are some drawbacks as a poor performance on older
Internet Explorer versions (most JS-frameworks have problems here) or on
Netbooks. Plus the fact that a RAP app cannot run in a single Browser
instance on multiple tabs simultaneously.

If you have more concrete questions you'll surely get an answer in this
newsgroup :-)

Regards,
Stefan.

[1] http://www.cas-pia.de/en/try.html Click on "Guest Access".


> We want to change our current framework to the RAP framework. I want to
> know if RAP is stable/safe enough for business use.
>
> I hope someone can help me.
Re: RAP ready for business use? [message #495546 is a reply to message #495312] Thu, 05 November 2009 10:32 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Markus  rüger is currently offline Markus rügerFriend
Messages: 369
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Hi,

from our point of view RAP is stable/safe enough for business use. We use it ourself since one of the earliest versions of RAP. At the beginning there have been a lot of Bugs or missing Features, but nowadays it is stable and most of RCP Code works in RAP.

The advantages that Stefan posted a really a great thing to use for a web application.

Regards,
Markus Krüger
Re: RAP ready for business use? [message #495658 is a reply to message #495312] Thu, 05 November 2009 15:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Stefan Hansel is currently offline Stefan HanselFriend
Messages: 103
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Dies ist eine mehrteilige Nachricht im MIME-Format.
--=_alternative 0057B3A4C1257665_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

We use RAP in over 20 production instances for one of our products and
more products and customers are coming.
The parts we use (jface + rwt) we consider as very stable. Indeed we
rarely faced any issues (with RAP ;) ) and in case of probles the
RAP-developers are very fast to help and answer in the newsgroups.

With its customizable widgets we could also add features, which are not
present in the official releases (integration of custom authentification
and seamless integration of word-processors).
We run mostly on IE6 sometimes even with HTTPs - so the most worse
scenario you can think of :)

I'm really happy that most of our developers don't need to know anything
of HTML and Javascript. Just the ones who needed to write the Widgets.


--=_alternative 0057B3A4C1257665_=
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"

<font size=2 face="sans-serif">We use RAP in over 20 production instances
for one of our products and more products and customers are coming.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">The parts we use (jface + rwt) we consider
as very stable. Indeed we rarely faced any issues (with RAP ;) ) and in
case of probles the RAP-developers are very fast to help and answer in
the newsgroups.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">With its customizable widgets we could
also add features, which are not present in the official releases (integration
of custom authentification and seamless integration of word-processors).</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">We run mostly on IE6 sometimes even
with HTTPs - so the most worse scenario you can think of :) </font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I'm really happy that most of our developers
don't need to know anything of HTML and Javascript. Just the ones who needed
to write the Widgets.</font>
<br>
<br>
--=_alternative 0057B3A4C1257665_=--
Re: RAP ready for business use? [message #495686 is a reply to message #495658] Thu, 05 November 2009 18:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Richard Catlin is currently offline Richard CatlinFriend
Messages: 50
Registered: July 2009
Member
For those who use this, what does your deployment environment look like? Are you using the traditional J2EE Servlet container or using an OSGi based app server such as Jonas or dm Server? What are your recommendations based on your experience?

Thanks for your input.
Richard Catlin
Re: RAP ready for business use? [message #495947 is a reply to message #495686] Fri, 06 November 2009 18:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Stefan Hansel is currently offline Stefan HanselFriend
Messages: 103
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
We use Tomcat 6 as our Servlet Container, running RAP, Spring and our
O/R-Mapper (still JDO) all at once.
To make things simple for us, we just use RWT + JFace parts standalone
(see the wiki or this forum for more information), so no OSGI is involved
here.

This decision was made, because we didn't need/want the classic workbench
layout (though it heavily improved with the latest version).
Also we wanted to retain all options to reduce the memory footprint of a
user-session, which we were afraid we couldn't do when using the
workbench.
Finally normal product development is hard enough even without OSGI - as
for now I don't see it would solve me more problems then it brings
(JPA/JDO and database-drivers don't like OSGI much).

Regards
Stefan
Re: RAP ready for business use? [message #496509 is a reply to message #495947] Tue, 10 November 2009 11:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Stefan   is currently offline Stefan Friend
Messages: 316
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
> Finally normal product development is hard enough even without OSGI - as
> for now I don't see it would solve me more problems then it brings
> (JPA/JDO and database-drivers don't like OSGI much).

There was a demo at ESE about EclipseLink [1] where they showed that
things improved in this area. However, I haven't tested it by myself and
there still seems to be some kind of magic involved (as specific
manifest headers).

Regards,
Stefan.

[1] http://www.eclipsecon.org/summiteurope2009/sessions?id=887
Re: RAP ready for business use? [message #498370 is a reply to message #496509] Mon, 16 November 2009 16:05 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Stefan Hansel is currently offline Stefan HanselFriend
Messages: 103
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Hehe,

Devs hate me sometimes, but as tech-lead I don't like magic but good old
stable technologies :)


... like Java 1.1 *g* ...

thanks for the link though !
Re: RAP ready for business use? [message #498501 is a reply to message #498370] Tue, 17 November 2009 09:46 Go to previous message
Stefan   is currently offline Stefan Friend
Messages: 316
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
I guess your developers have the choice between VI and EMacs?
;-)
Stefan.

stefan.hansel@tolina.de schrieb:
> Hehe,
>
> Devs hate me sometimes, but as tech-lead I don't like magic but good old
> stable technologies :)
>
>
> .. like Java 1.1 *g* ...
>
> thanks for the link though !
Previous Topic:[Tree] Focus Problem
Next Topic:Exception when opening Editor
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Apr 27 16:26:53 GMT 2024

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03854 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top