|
| Re: Zest: Open Constraints for TreeLayout and others? [message #240731 is a reply to message #240676] |
Tue, 15 January 2008 05:16   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: irbull.cs.uvic.ca
Can you please open a bug for this and I will see what I can do.
(open it in GEF under the GEF component)
Just so I understand, you don't mind if your canvas grows, the node
sizes are what's important.
cheers,
ian
Miles Parker wrote:
>
> Sorry to newgroup bomb, but I'm also wondering if there is a way to
> override these layouts so that they get set to a preferred size equal to
> the 'ideal' layout sans Node Resizing. IOTW, I just want to layout my
> tree nodes such that they are all one size and the viewer grows to
> whatever size fits that ideal. I've tried all of the LayoutStyle options
> and have figured out how to give it some arbitrary size by overriding
> preLayoutAlgorithm. I suppose I can calculate the expected max x and y
> nodes and simply set size by an appropriate multiple but I'm wondering
> if there is a more elegant way.
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: Zest: Open Constraints for TreeLayout and others? [message #241173 is a reply to message #240980] |
Fri, 01 February 2008 06:18 |
 Miles Parker
Messages: 1341
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Oh, and not just the node sizes, but the relative spacing between nodes
(in the minimal distance case).
On 2008-01-26 19:14:48 -0700, Miles Parker <milesparker@gmail.com> said:
>
> Exactly, and will do.
>
> On 2008-01-14 22:16:30 -0700, Ian Bull <irbull@cs.uvic.ca> said:
>
>> Can you please open a bug for this and I will see what I can do.
>>
>> (open it in GEF under the GEF component)
>>
>> Just so I understand, you don't mind if your canvas grows, the node
>> sizes are what's important.
>>
>> cheers,
>> ian
>>
>> Miles Parker wrote:
>>>
>>> Sorry to newgroup bomb, but I'm also wondering if there is a way to
>>> override these layouts so that they get set to a preferred size equal
>>> to the 'ideal' layout sans Node Resizing. IOTW, I just want to layout
>>> my tree nodes such that they are all one size and the viewer grows to
>>> whatever size fits that ideal. I've tried all of the LayoutStyle
>>> options and have figured out how to give it some arbitrary size by
>>> overriding preLayoutAlgorithm. I suppose I can calculate the expected
>>> max x and y nodes and simply set size by an appropriate multiple but
>>> I'm wondering if there is a more elegant way.
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03912 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
