| Dangling references when creating profile [message #1067736] |
Wed, 10 July 2013 07:19  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi,
I'm creating a profile, some dataTypes are generalizations of MARTE_Library metaclasses. I think I'm importing good the packages, and using them fine.
When I validate the model, is ok, only two warnings appear:
Warning:
Description: Not all the members of namespace '<Profile> My_Profile' are distinguishable within it.
Element: <Profile> My_Profile
Parent: null
Type: EMF Problem
Next step is create the profile, and then many Errors appear. All of then have in common the message, and BasicTypes of Marte:
"The feature 'eType' of 'myProperty: MARTE_Library_BasicNFP_Types_NFP_CommonType' contains a dangling reference 'MARTE_Library_BasicNFP_Types_NFP_CommonType'.
Could someone help me to find out how to solve it, please?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Dangling references when creating profile [message #1690785 is a reply to message #1690782] |
Tue, 31 March 2015 05:31  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi
The original report had no repro, so I for one took no notice.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 31/03/2015 10:13, Fernando Herrera wrote:
> Hi to everybody,
>
> Did anybody get an answer on this topic?
>
> I wrote a post in 2015 February in a similar thread:
>
> "Definition of Profiles with MARTE´s NFPs fails"
>
> And, as for the guys who first reported it, there was no answer.
>
> I think this is a totally limiting factor. We are trying to define
> improved modelling methodologies and we find some lacks in MARTE that
> we want to cover with an extension.
>
> However, the most recent version where the definition of a profile
> using MARTE data types is possible is in Papyrus 0.8.2 over Eclipse
> Indigo.
>
> But there are several more recent versions of both Eclipse and Papyrus
> where this does not work (including Luna!).
>
> We tried Polarsys. But then we find that datatypes cannot be
> defined (a really strange bug).
> Therefore, we are ought to work on a very old release of Eclipse,
> Papyrus, etc.
>
> Is there any plan for fixing this issue?
>
> Best!
>
> Fernando
|
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.05141 seconds
Home
I follow working in another diagrams, but the problem continues.