| Papyrus vs eUML2 [message #1030112] |
Sat, 30 March 2013 18:01 |
 roshni rajagopal
Messages: 9
Registered: February 2013 |
Junior Member |
|
|
Comparing Papyrus & Soyatec eUML2, we preferred Papyrus because
a) Its more suited for top down modeling while eUML2 asks for coding details like package hierarchy before allowing you to create a diagram.
b)One can easily create a profile in papyrus. We have created a database profile in papyrus which shows primary keys etc
c)Papyrus being part of EMF - is likely to be free and updated frequently. While soyatec euml2 is not free in the latest eclipse versions.
What are your thoughts on the above. Which is more stable ? Papyrus is not very stable and gives lots of null pointer and other exceptions - its also in incubator status. How much support & commitment is there for making Papyrus a stable and usable tool?
Do share ur experience & recommendations. Also does anyone know if we can create a 'database' profile in eUML2>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02589 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
