Home » Eclipse Projects » Subversive » Subversive ready for Ganymede?
| Subversive ready for Ganymede? [message #13881] |
Sat, 01 March 2008 08:45  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi,
I would like to know, if Subversive officially supports Ganymede (3.4)
already?
So far the latest previews I tested with Subversive had no major
problems, but at least sharing a (Web) project from the M4 build of the
Java EE Ganymede package failed.
AFAIR it caused some kind of Overflow Exception.
So please tell me, if 3.4 is already supported?
If it's supposed to, I might create a Bugzilla entry.
Thanks,
Werner
|
|
| | | | |
| Re: Subversive ready for Ganymede? [message #14395 is a reply to message #14370] |
Wed, 05 March 2008 06:16  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Erkki,
We work together with Eclipse Foundation to find a solution for legal
issues, because it's not only usability problem. In particular, this legal
issue seems as blocker for project inclusion in standard distribution
packages, etc. Every party here, like Subversive team, Technology PMC,
Eclipse Foundation, really want to close legal issues, but it's really
complicated process. Anyway, we already made step forward in this direction
and as the result Subversive became an Eclipse project. I beleive that
someday we will find a solution, which allows us to distribute a project as
one package.
Best regards,
Igor Vinnykov
"Erkki Lindpere" <erkki@lap.ee> ???????/???????? ? ???????? ?????????:
news:fqkj3f$le8$1@build.eclipse.org...
> Is this a permanent issue or are the legal issues going to get solved at
> some point? If not, then this seems like a pretty bad joke -- Subclipse at
> least can be installed from a single update site, which makes a third
> party plug-in more easily installable than Eclipse.org's "official" SVN
> provider.
>
> Currently the feature on the Ganymede site will be installed without any
> connector and the user left to figure out what he is supposed to do get
> one and not everyone is going to realise what is missing or where to find
> a link to the additional update site ( like
> http://www.eclipse.org/subversive )
>
> Erkki
>
> Alexander Gurov wrote:
>> Dear Hiroki,
>>
>> Due to Eclipse legal restrictions native connector also is not included
>> into the Subversive plug-in distribution and should be installed from the
>> Polarion.org site. So, regarding to this we returned SVN Kit 1.1.4 as
>> default connector. Also we added two SVN 1.5-compatible connectors:
>> Native JavaHL 1.5.0 development build and SVN Kit 1.2.0 development
>> build.
>>
|
|
| |
| Re: Subversive ready for Galileo? [message #43850 is a reply to message #43814] |
Mon, 06 April 2009 07:32 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hello Werner,
Now we don't have any Babel translations for Subversive, I fired a bug about
this problem. "Team Provider Localization (Optional)" contains only french
and japan translations, but they are quite obsolete and I've also
contributed them to Babel.
Sorry, I don't fully understand the problem you wrote about, could you
please describe it in more details?
> As German Language Champion I'm currently testing Babel Language packs
> while working with Eclipse.
>
> And the 2 biggests "Problem Children" regarding an otherwise often up to
> 99% translation are:
> - Mylyn
> - Subversive
>
> I even installed what you call "Team Provider Localization (Optional)" but
> whatever that means to localize, the SVN Repository perspective for
> Example is still all English.
> I know, other (legal) issues may keep you busy, but for a vendor already
> from Germany I would call this a little embarrassing, at least for its
> native language ;-)
>
> Let me know, if you need any help on that? Babel Support is also a killer
> criterium to being ready for Galileo! Not just some ongoing legal "babel"
>
> Cheers,
> Werner
|
|
| | | |
| Re: Subversive ready for Galileo? [message #44404 is a reply to message #44314] |
Mon, 13 April 2009 06:05 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Since Subversive normally won't be preinstalled anyway (just take the
license issue, which also still looks WONTFIX ?;-) that may be acceptable as
long as Babel is supported.
You should no longer have those separate "i18n" updates though!
Did you provide the sources for that to Babel?
I could forward your last post to the Babel newsgroup, but beside that I
cannot help you as long as it does not show up in the Babel Translation
server.
"Igor Burilo" <igor.burilo@polarion.org> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:gruuul$7gd$1@build.eclipse.org...
> Hello Werner,
>
> Subversive really was registered in Babel long ago (you can check it in
> http://babel.eclipse.org/babel/map_files.php by selecting
> technology.subversive project in projects list) but there are no
> translations for it, I already reported about it:
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=268926.
> I also marked bug relative to corresponding Simultaneous Release
> requirement as WONTFIX.
> Unfortunately I can't check why there are no translations, so if it's
> possible could you please check it?
> Thanks for taking attention to Subversive project.
>
>> See this "Must Do" for Galileo:
>>
>> - Localization The project participates in Babel, meaning it is
>> registered and available for string translation, etc. M6 Script
>>
>> ( http://wiki.eclipse.org/Galileo_Simultaneous_Release#Must_Do)
>>
>> According to the Wiki page, Subversive plans to participate, but not
>> being registered with Babel means, it may not be accepted.
>>
>> Werner
>
>
|
|
| | |
| Re: Subversive ready for Galileo? [message #44566 is a reply to message #44404] |
Tue, 14 April 2009 03:44 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hello Werner,
I contributed our translations ("i18n") to Babel, for more details please
see https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=258783.
I will remove our "i18n" plugins as soon as we have Babel translations.
I marked bug corresponding to Galileo Simultaneous Release requirement
"Localization - Babel"
(https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=254172) as 'wontfix'
following to advices from "Reminder and instructions to completeG-bugs" post
from cross-project mailing list: "For one, if you don't think you'll be able
to do something ... or, you think maybe there is a 50/50 chance you'll be
able to pull it off at the last minute, then don't wait, just mark is "won't
fix" and give some explanation as to why."
If any additional steps are required from our side, please, note it.
> Since Subversive normally won't be preinstalled anyway (just take the
> license issue, which also still looks WONTFIX ?;-) that may be acceptable
> as long as Babel is supported.
> You should no longer have those separate "i18n" updates though!
> Did you provide the sources for that to Babel?
>
> I could forward your last post to the Babel newsgroup, but beside that I
> cannot help you as long as it does not show up in the Babel Translation
> server.
>
> "Igor Burilo" <igor.burilo@polarion.org> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:gruuul$7gd$1@build.eclipse.org...
>> Hello Werner,
>>
>> Subversive really was registered in Babel long ago (you can check it in
>> http://babel.eclipse.org/babel/map_files.php by selecting
>> technology.subversive project in projects list) but there are no
>> translations for it, I already reported about it:
>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=268926.
>> I also marked bug relative to corresponding Simultaneous Release
>> requirement as WONTFIX.
>> Unfortunately I can't check why there are no translations, so if it's
>> possible could you please check it?
>> Thanks for taking attention to Subversive project.
>>
>>> See this "Must Do" for Galileo:
>>>
>>> - Localization The project participates in Babel, meaning it is
>>> registered and available for string translation, etc. M6 Script
>>>
>>> ( http://wiki.eclipse.org/Galileo_Simultaneous_Release#Must_Do)
>>>
>>> According to the Wiki page, Subversive plans to participate, but not
>>> being registered with Babel means, it may not be accepted.
>>>
>>> Werner
>>
>>
>
|
|
| |
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Tue Jul 22 18:35:23 EDT 2025
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.06495 seconds |
Home