| Inconsistencies between ".di"file and ".uml"file [message #987025] |
Thu, 22 November 2012 21:58  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
|
My papyrus is 0.9.1,when I delete something,like one class,in the class diagram and save the ".di" file,but the ".uml" file remain the deleted element.I reopen the ".uml" file,it remain the deleted element as before.What's wrong?Is it a bug?By the way, how can I generate the ".di" file from ".uml" file?
|
|
|
| Re: Inconsistencies between ".di"file and ".uml"file [message #987031 is a reply to message #987025] |
Thu, 22 November 2012 22:48  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi,
You are probably deleting only the *view* of the element from the
diagram. To delete the element from the model also is a different
operation. By default, the Delete key deletes only the view.
Right-click on the element in the diagram to find an action to delete
the element from the model.
What do you mean by generating the *.di file from the *.uml file? It
isn't a generated file. It has entirely its own data, with only
references to the diagrams in the *.notation file. This latter is what
references the elements in the *.uml file.
HTH,
Christian
On 2012-11-23 02:58:29 +0000, Beatus Ding said:
> My papyrus is 0.9.1,when I delete something,like one class,in the class
> diagram and save the ".di" file,but the ".uml" file remain the deleted
> element.I reopen the ".uml" file,it remain the deleted element as
> before.What's wrong?Is it a bug?By the way, how can I generate the
> ".di" file from ".uml" file?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.08626 seconds
Home