| call stack problems [message #135937] |
Sun, 21 September 2008 02:44  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi,
I'm using eclipse 3.4.0 with tptp 4.5.0 setted at compiler compliance
level 1.6
I followed very carefully -so it seems to me- tutorial's instructions in
order to obtain call stack information, but when I try to profile any
class, call stack windows remains empty.
Setting options used -as stated in tutorial- are: show execution flow in
executione time analysis. I report that in setting options did not
appeared check box for "Collect boundary classes excluded by the filter
set" and was not possible "set Boundary class depth to 1".
Anyone can help mr?
Best regards
Andrea
|
|
|
| Re: call stack problems [message #135982 is a reply to message #135937] |
Mon, 22 September 2008 11:16  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Andrea,
The "Collect boundary classes excluded by the filter set" and "set Boundary
class depth to 1" are options available only to Java profiler of JVM 1.5 or
lower. Since you are using 4.5.0 and JVM 1.6, you can simply select
Execution Time Analysis and leave the default setting 'Show execution flow
graphical details' for call stack information. Please check the profiling
filter setting and make sure you have include the package/class/method that
you are profiling/targeting.
Eugene
"andrea " <ascarpa@dsi.unive.it> wrote in message
news:8c81ef7dd096aa3429d214ae0bae1b92$1@www.eclipse.org...
> Hi,
>
> I'm using eclipse 3.4.0 with tptp 4.5.0 setted at compiler compliance
> level 1.6
>
> I followed very carefully -so it seems to me- tutorial's instructions in
> order to obtain call stack information, but when I try to profile any
> class, call stack windows remains empty.
> Setting options used -as stated in tutorial- are: show execution flow in
> executione time analysis. I report that in setting options did not
> appeared check box for "Collect boundary classes excluded by the filter
> set" and was not possible "set Boundary class depth to 1".
>
> Anyone can help mr?
>
> Best regards
>
> Andrea
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.27901 seconds
Home