|Re: UML components: Add information about responsibility [message #873480 is a reply to message #873475]
||Fri, 18 May 2012 10:29
| Ed Willink
Registered: July 2009
All your suggested approaches are possible, but if you're going to go to
the trouble of modeling responsibilities, perhaps you should model them
so that they might remain accurate and be useful.
I'm not a user of profiles, but this seems like a good case for one. I
would start by looking at the MOF Life cycle model, MARTE or SysML to
see whether what you want is already supported.
On 18/05/2012 11:16, Tex Iano wrote:
> I have the following situation:
> I have a UML component diagram as architecture model. Now I want to
> add information concerning the responsibility of the components, i.e.
> who is responsible for their implementation.
> What do you think how to add this information?
> As UML comments? As something like OCL statements? External database?
> I want to add this responsibilities to everything: to components, to
> classes etc. Maybe with UML comments the diagram gets a bit bloated?
Powered by FUDForum
. Page generated in 0.01889 seconds