|Re: Reference to Superclass [message #831209 is a reply to message #830332]
||Wed, 28 March 2012 12:04
| Chris Delahunt
Registered: July 2009
Can you explain the relationship a bit or what you are trying to accomplish? It isn't clear why you would want to have Blubb with a 1:1 that can hold any instance, or how you would expect to represent this in the database. When you read in a Blubb, it needs to use that mapping to read in a thing instance, so the type needs to be determined somehow.
If the type is determined somewhere else (I assume you mean other entities are extending Blubb), why not map the 'thing' at those points?
Powered by FUDForum
. Page generated in 0.02222 seconds