| Problems with AGR and Eclipse workbench state [message #92712] |
Wed, 21 February 2007 09:28  |
 Philipp
Messages: 49
Registered: July 2009 |
Member |
|
|
This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_alternative 003408C6C1257289_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Hi,
I have just started using AGR for setting up UI tests. Now, I am running
into the following problem over and over again.
I record a testcase in which I select something in a tree. Initially that
tree is collapsed, so the recording covers my by click expanding of tree
items.
However, if I decide to delete that testcase (because I have done sth
wrong) and want to record it again I find myself faced with an already
expanded tree in most cases. Recording that, I dont need to expand certain
tree elements (actually I cannot, coz I would have to collapse them before
expanding ;-) ). This is fine when running the test in quick launch.
However when running in standard mode this tree state does not exist and
the tree is not expanded, so the test will fail. I believe this is a
workbench state behavior and launching a fresh workspace (or workbench)
like in standard run gives you a "clean" context. Whats best practise to
handle this issue. Has anybody experienced the same thing? I find that
quite anoying. Any help is very much appreciated.
Thx in advance
Philipp
--=_alternative 003408C6C1257289_=
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Hi,</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I have just started using AGR for setting
up UI tests. Now, I am running into the following problem over and over
again.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I record a testcase in which I select
something in a tree. Initially that tree is collapsed, so the recording
covers my by click expanding of tree items. </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">However, if I decide to delete that
testcase (because I have done sth wrong) and want to record it again I
find myself faced with an already expanded tree in most cases. Recording
that, I dont need to expand certain tree elements (actually I cannot, coz
I would have to collapse them before expanding ;-) ). This is fine when
running the test in quick launch. However when running in standard mode
this tree state does not exist and the tree is not expanded, so the test
will fail. I believe this is a workbench state behavior and launching a
fresh workspace (or workbench) like in standard run gives you a "clean"
context. Whats best practise to handle this issue. Has anybody experienced
the same thing? I find that quite anoying. Any help is very much appreciated.
</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Thx in advance<br>
Philipp</font>
--=_alternative 003408C6C1257289_=--
|
|
|
| Re: Problems with AGR and Eclipse workbench state [message #92728 is a reply to message #92712] |
Wed, 21 February 2007 15:06  |
No real name
Messages: 404
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_000E_01C7559F.E92B2B70
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This problem was addressed by Liz Dancy in 4.4i1. See =
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3D164197
Thanks,
Ali Mehregani
<philipp_tiedt@de.ibm.com> wrote in message =
news:erh3bm$ej5$1@utils.eclipse.org...
Hi,=20
I have just started using AGR for setting up UI tests. Now, I am =
running into the following problem over and over again.=20
I record a testcase in which I select something in a tree. Initially =
that tree is collapsed, so the recording covers my by click expanding of =
tree items.=20
However, if I decide to delete that testcase (because I have done sth =
wrong) and want to record it again I find myself faced with an already =
expanded tree in most cases. Recording that, I dont need to expand =
certain tree elements (actually I cannot, coz I would have to collapse =
them before expanding ;-) ). This is fine when running the test in quick =
launch. However when running in standard mode this tree state does not =
exist and the tree is not expanded, so the test will fail. I believe =
this is a workbench state behavior and launching a fresh workspace (or =
workbench) like in standard run gives you a "clean" context. Whats best =
practise to handle this issue. Has anybody experienced the same thing? I =
find that quite anoying. Any help is very much appreciated.=20
Thx in advance
Philipp
------=_NextPart_000_000E_01C7559F.E92B2B70
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.3020" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>This problem was addressed by Liz Dancy =
in=20
4.4i1. See <A=20
href=3D"https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3D164197">https://b=
ugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3D164197</A></FONT></DIV >
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Ali Mehregani</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV><<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:philipp_tiedt@de.ibm.com">philipp_tiedt@de.ibm.com</A>>=
wrote=20
in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:erh3bm$ej5$1@utils.eclipse.org">news:erh3bm$ej5$1@utils.ecli=
pse.org</A>...</DIV><BR><FONT=20
face=3Dsans-serif size=3D2>Hi,</FONT> <BR><BR><FONT face=3Dsans-serif =
size=3D2>I have=20
just started using AGR for setting up UI tests. Now, I am running into =
the=20
following problem over and over again.</FONT> <BR><BR><FONT =
face=3Dsans-serif=20
size=3D2>I record a testcase in which I select something in a tree. =
Initially=20
that tree is collapsed, so the recording covers my by click expanding =
of tree=20
items. </FONT><BR><FONT face=3Dsans-serif size=3D2>However, if I =
decide to delete=20
that testcase (because I have done sth wrong) and want to record it =
again I=20
find myself faced with an already expanded tree in most cases. =
Recording that,=20
I dont need to expand certain tree elements (actually I cannot, coz I =
would=20
have to collapse them before expanding ;-) ). This is fine when =
running the=20
test in quick launch. However when running in standard mode this tree =
state=20
does not exist and the tree is not expanded, so the test will fail. I =
believe=20
this is a workbench state behavior and launching a fresh workspace (or =
workbench) like in standard run gives you a "clean" context. Whats =
best=20
practise to handle this issue. Has anybody experienced the same thing? =
I find=20
that quite anoying. Any help is very much appreciated. =
</FONT><BR><BR><FONT=20
face=3Dsans-serif size=3D2>Thx in=20
advance<BR>Philipp</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_000E_01C7559F.E92B2B70--
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03522 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
