| [QVTo] Disambiguation of black-box operations [message #789953] |
Fri, 03 February 2012 11:01  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi there,
I've been using QVTo black box operations for a while now. It's a great
way to make some operations over models pluggable.
That been said, I faced long time ago the problem of being unable to
disambiguate operations having the same name, and being contributed by
different classes. The editor doesn't seen to allow using black-box name
space.
Is there a way to achieve this, or is it just unimplemented?
Thanks,
Víctor.
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: [QVTo] Disambiguation of black-box operations [message #798423 is a reply to message #798408] |
Tue, 14 February 2012 12:24  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Ed,
So shall I assume it is not implemented?
Not sure how to achieve it, but changing the grammar of the language and
modify the editor (assuming thats the solution) doesn't sound like an
simple patch ;) I know you are well trained on that field, for what I've
heard around, so it may be piece of cake for you :P
I sounds cheaper to me to find a workaround instead (trying to remove
the need of disambiguation).
Thanks for your feedback,
Víctor.
Ed Willink escribió:
> Hi Victor
>
> It looks like you'll have to help yourself. It's probably a relatively
> simple patch.
>
> Regards
>
> Ed Willink
>
> On 14/02/2012 14:51, Víctor Roldán Betancort wrote:
>> ping?
>>
>> Víctor Roldán Betancort escribió:
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> I've been using QVTo black box operations for a while now. It's a great
>>> way to make some operations over models pluggable.
>>>
>>> That been said, I faced long time ago the problem of being unable to
>>> disambiguate operations having the same name, and being contributed by
>>> different classes. The editor doesn't seen to allow using black-box name
>>> space.
>>>
>>> Is there a way to achieve this, or is it just unimplemented?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Víctor.
>>
>
|
|
|
| Re: [QVTo] Disambiguation of black-box operations [message #798447 is a reply to message #798423] |
Tue, 14 February 2012 12:59 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Victor
> So shall I assume it is not implemented?
Who knows?
> I sounds cheaper to me to find a workaround instead (trying to remove
> the need of disambiguation).
Certainly a workaround is quicker.
Hopefully QVTo will start to move again after Juno.
Regards
Ed Willink
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.06220 seconds
Home