-p2 directory call with -uninstallIU [message #642206] |
Tue, 30 November 2010 06:53  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
I recently installed a feature and it's plugins to a p2-enabled RCP
application with success: Both the feature and the plugins are installed
as expected in the plugins and feature folder of the RCP app.
As suggested I added the ".feature.group" string as IU identifier
After this I tried an uninstall process, where I changed only the
following lines:
1) I replaced the call argument
-installIU someid.feature.group
by
-uninstallIU someid.feature.group
2) I did not list the -repository argument
This deinstallation seems to have succeeded (no error message or log
file) and as expected the before installed feature is no longer existing
in the features folder. *But* the plugins are still part of the plugins
folder. Is this a known and expected behaviour? Personally I would
strongly appreciate to have the plugins removed as well. Is there some
additional call argument necessary to realize that?
Thanks & Greetings from Bremen,
Daniel Krügler
|
|
|
|
|
Re: -p2 directory call with -uninstallIU [message #643412 is a reply to message #643353] |
Mon, 06 December 2010 14:00  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Afaik, things should be removed by the p2 gc which runs as part of any
p2 operation. It may be possible to only run the gc...
- henrik
Daniel Krügler <dsp@bdal.de> wrote:
> On 12/3/2010 17:01, Jacek Pospychala wrote:
>> hi,
>> it's generally problematic. In the past, they were kept to don't
> > break
>> other still installed plugins, that may depend on them.
>> Eclipse was able to decide to remove them, but only after another
> > run. I
>> think this is still the case.
>
> Let me refine my question then: Do you suggest a second
> uninstall run with the *exact* same number of parameters as in the
> first step? I thought I tried that and this was not successful,
> because the bundles had already been uninstalled. I look into this a
> second time, though.
>
> Thanks & Greetings from Bremen,
>
> Daniel Krügler
--
- henrik
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.07887 seconds