|PackageMerge in UML metamodels [message #627705]
||Fri, 19 June 2009 09:14
| Timothy Marc
Registered: July 2009
just to let me know, whether i've understood the principle of
PackageMerge correctly. Let's have a look on UML::Class, which is in the
end and Classifier - SturcturedClassifier, BehavioredClassifier -
These depth of inheritance results of the execution of all merge
relationships, which are defined in the model. Is this correct?
Currently, i'm digging a bit deeper into all the models, which
constructs the merged UML model. But i had a lot af questions concerning
the dependencies of all those models.
1. For what purpose is the Ecore.uml, 10536.uml, 10537.uml, UML2_2_UML.ecore
2. What are the differences between Superstructure and UML.merged? It
seems to me, that UML merged results by the execution of package merge
relationsships defined in UML.uml. The UML.uml merges the packages of
the compliance levels. And the compliance levels refers to either the
Infrastructure.uml and the Superstructure.uml.
It seems to me, that the Superstructure.uml, was modeled without any
merge definition, just for the construction of the compliance levels. Is
this correct? If so, i would have expected, that the Superstructure.uml
merges the constructs and primitive types packages of the infrastructure
as it is shows in figure 7.1 of the current UML Spec 2.2. But the only
import, i found in the Superstructure.uml addresses the primitive types
of the Infrastructure.
So, i would really appreciate it, if somepne could explain all this
relationships to me, in particular the rational for the additional
Thanks a lot
Powered by FUDForum
. Page generated in 0.26333 seconds