Skip to main content

Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Archived » GMT (Generative Modeling Technologies) » Re: km3 -> ecore - bad practice in metamodeling?
Re: km3 -> ecore - bad practice in metamodeling? [message #613642] Thu, 20 March 2008 18:53
Ed Merks is currently offline Ed MerksFriend
Messages: 29385
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member

I'm not sure what to say. This issue came up recently on the GMT
newgroup and it's something that KM3 folks need to consider. Something
like annotations to specify things not in KM3 but needed in Ecore would
seem to make sense.

Matti Husu wrote:
> Hi, please tell me what do you think and is there a way to avoid the
> problems below.
> First you specify metamodel with KM3 there has to be Primitive types
> package if classes have attributes (String, Boolean...).
> Then you inject it to a .ecore file. Everything is cool. But if you
> want to make an editor (EMF/GEF or GMF) you need .genmodel.
> This can't be created at least on Eclipse 3.2.1/EMF 2.2.1
> In Eclipse you can but you have to specify nsUri etc for the
> PrimitiveTypes-package and corresponding java classes for Integer etc.
> I think GMF-ecore diagram editor is more handy.
> -Matti
Previous Topic:EVL commenting
Next Topic:Re: km3 -> ecore - bad practice in metamodeling?
Goto Forum:

Current Time: Tue Jun 19 12:49:07 GMT 2018

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.01931 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top