Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Eclipse Projects » EPF » Synchronization problem with Task x Task Descriptor in duplicated tasks in same WBS
Synchronization problem with Task x Task Descriptor in duplicated tasks in same WBS [message #591419] Thu, 05 March 2009 12:21
Fernanda Oliveira is currently offline Fernanda Oliveira
Messages: 21
Registered: July 2009
Junior Member
Hi,
I searched for a solution in other emails and in the bug system, but I
couldn´t found.

I elaborated a very large diagram with all phases of my process.
Because of this, I needed to repeat the same task several types in the
same WBS.

During the WBS creation, when I drag-n-drop the task in the first type,
was created the "monitor_non_conformities" task Descriptor.

For the second instance of the same task method, EPFC automatically
renamed the second task descriptor to "monitor_non_conformities_2" and
unchecked the "synchronize with source". For the third task the same,
and so on...

I noticed that the "synchronize with source" was unchecked when I
changed the 'presentation name' of the method task source and executed
the default synchronization, and only the first instance updated the
'presentation name' correctly.

I reviewed all the WBS, changing manually the 'presentation name' and
re-checking the "synchronize with source" for all other copies, but I
maintained the name as "monitor_non_conformities_2" and
"monitor_non_conformities_3", etc...

But now I added some steps and output artifacts, and all copies (even
with "synchronize with source" checked) were NOT synchronized, only the
"first instance", only the first task descriptor I created was correctly
synchronized.

I´m really worried, because I don´t know how to maintain this large
diagram up-to-date if the "copies" were not synchronized. What should I
do to guarantee the synchronization?
I tried to rename the 'name' (not presentation name) with the same name
of the method task source, and it also didn´t solve my problem.

Sorry the large e-mail, I don´t know if someone is reading, but I think
it´s important to report these issues or if it is not a issue, I can
understand better the EPFC, because I like and believe in your good work.

Thank you,
Fernanda
Previous Topic:EPF Wiki harvesting -> EPF ?
Next Topic:License question
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Sep 01 14:34:13 EDT 2014

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.01652 seconds