|processes and configurations relationship [message #580915]
||Tue, 31 July 2007 18:48
Originally posted by: carlos.ribeiro.edisoft.pt|
One thing I still do not understand is the reason to have to associate a
process (capability pattern/ delivery process) to a configuration at
I thought that I could:
1. define all the Method Content and,
2. define all the Processes (Capability Patterns and Delivery Processes)
without caring about the configuration.
3. Lastly, define the configurations and determine which Processes to
include on them.
I see no reason to have to associate processes to configurations at
Moreover, I read that the choice of default configuration, once done,
cannot be changed!
Can anyone explain me this or point to some document where it is explained?
Thanks in advance,
Powered by FUDForum
. Page generated in 0.01615 seconds