| [Debug] Use of org.eclipse.debug.internal.ui.viewers.*provisional as API [message #481894] |
Mon, 24 August 2009 12:19  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi,
is it ok to use packages
org.eclipse.debug.internal.ui.viewers.model.provisional and
org.eclipse.debug.internal.ui.viewers.provisional as API? From what I have
seen during the last releases these packages have become stable, and JDT
debugging uses them already. Or are there plans to refactor them into usual
API packages?
Additionally I noticed that JDT uses internal classes like
org.eclipse.debug.internal.ui.model.elements.ElementContentP rovider in its
implementation. Are there plans to make these classes API as well? In
general, shouldn't JDT debug tooling be treated like any other client?
Currently it seems to me to be more equal than others.. ;)
Regards
Christian
|
|
|
| Re: [Debug] Use of org.eclipse.debug.internal.ui.viewers.*provisional as API [message #481915 is a reply to message #481894] |
Mon, 24 August 2009 13:43  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Christian Georgi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is it ok to use packages
> org.eclipse.debug.internal.ui.viewers.model.provisional and
> org.eclipse.debug.internal.ui.viewers.provisional as API? From what I
> have seen during the last releases these packages have become stable,
> and JDT debugging uses them already. Or are there plans to refactor
> them into usual API packages?
>
> Additionally I noticed that JDT uses internal classes like
> org.eclipse.debug.internal.ui.model.elements.ElementContentP rovider in
> its implementation. Are there plans to make these classes API as well?
> In general, shouldn't JDT debug tooling be treated like any other
> client? Currently it seems to me to be more equal than others.. ;)
I think asking this question on platform-debug-dev mailing list is a
better idea. In Eclipse, provisional API can still mean that the API may
change, so you have to becareful.
Cheers,
Chris Aniszczyk | EclipseSource Austin | +1 860 839 2465
http://twitter.com/eclipsesource | http://twitter.com/caniszczyk
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04961 seconds
Home