| comparing 0.95 with 1.0 [message #479944] |
Thu, 13 August 2009 04:24  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi!
I am considering porting our Erlang IDE (http://erlide.org) on DLTK, but
am stuck on Eclipse 3.4, which means DLTK 0.95.
I couldn't find an executive summary of things that are changed in 1.0,
is there any?
The big thing I notice is the use of EMF, which probably has a bunch of
new stuff in the 3.5 release.
Will there be any maintenance on 0.95? I suppose not, but it doesn't
hurt to ask.
best regards,
Vlad
|
|
|
| Re: comparing 0.95 with 1.0 [message #479962 is a reply to message #479944] |
Thu, 13 August 2009 05:38  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Vlad,
DLTK 1.0 is compatible with Eclipse 3.4 (you should use appropriate
version of EMF as well).
There is no maintenance planned for 0.95, since most problems could not
be solved without changing API. And API changes require to increment
version number.
Regards,
Alex
Vlad Dumitrescu wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am considering porting our Erlang IDE (http://erlide.org) on DLTK, but
> am stuck on Eclipse 3.4, which means DLTK 0.95.
>
> I couldn't find an executive summary of things that are changed in 1.0,
> is there any?
>
> The big thing I notice is the use of EMF, which probably has a bunch of
> new stuff in the 3.5 release.
>
> Will there be any maintenance on 0.95? I suppose not, but it doesn't
> hurt to ask.
>
> best regards,
> Vlad
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: comparing 0.95 with 1.0 [message #484342 is a reply to message #484305] |
Sun, 06 September 2009 23:38 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Gergely Nagy wrote:
> Alex Panchenko wrote:
>> DLTK 1.0 is compatible with Eclipse 3.4 (you should use appropriate
>> version of EMF as well).
>
> Hmm, would I be foolish to ask: is it compatible with 3.3 as well? Thanks,
> Gergo
DLTK Core, Javascript and Ruby should are believed to be compatible with
3.3.
DLTK Tcl is compatible with 3.4+.
Regards,
Alex
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04951 seconds
Home