Home » Modeling » Modeling (top-level project) » BPMN2(Project Status)
BPMN2 [message #479143] |
Sun, 09 August 2009 15:20  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Is there some place that contains a status on this sub-project. The 'project' page is rather empty .
Regards,
Ryan
|
|
| | | | | |
Re: BPMN2 [message #480512 is a reply to message #480130] |
Mon, 17 August 2009 08:54   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Ryan,
I'm not sure how that document relates to the adopted draft either, but
I would expect the OMG to post an official adopted specification at some
point in the very near future.
Lots of folks are eager to use the metamodel once it is available, but
not so many are willing/able to contribute to implementing it. So, we
would gladly welcome your contribution in this area. I'll do some
digging to find out what the latest status of the specification is...
Kenn
Ryan wrote:
>
> Kenn,
>
> Thanks for providing a status update.
>
> I looked on the OMG site and the only BPMN spec. they have published is
> version 1.2; so I guess version 2.0 is still in a review phase.
>
> I did find a document dated May 22, 2009 that was a consortium submittal
> in response to the RFP. However, don't know what relationship it has to
> anything approved by OMG.
>
> It is located at:
> http://www.bpmnstyle.com/wp-content/uploads/BPMN%202-0%20Spe cification%20BMI%2009-05-03.pdf
>
>
> If this document is close enough, or another document is available, I
> will be glad to work on creating a EMF model.
>
> Please let me know if there is something I can do to help get this
> project started.
>
> Regards,
> Ryan
>
|
|
| | | | | | | |
Re: BPMN2 [message #617767 is a reply to message #479242] |
Thu, 13 August 2009 21:26  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Kenn,
Thanks for providing a status update.
I looked on the OMG site and the only BPMN spec. they have published is version 1.2; so I guess version 2.0 is still in a review phase.
I did find a document dated May 22, 2009 that was a consortium submittal in response to the RFP. However, don't know what relationship it has to anything approved by OMG.
It is located at:
http://www.bpmnstyle.com/wp-content/uploads/BPMN%202-0%20Spe cification%20BMI%2009-05-03.pdf
If this document is close enough, or another document is available, I will be glad to work on creating a EMF model.
Please let me know if there is something I can do to help get this project started.
Regards,
Ryan
|
|
|
Re: BPMN2 [message #617781 is a reply to message #617767] |
Mon, 17 August 2009 08:54  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Ryan,
I'm not sure how that document relates to the adopted draft either, but
I would expect the OMG to post an official adopted specification at some
point in the very near future.
Lots of folks are eager to use the metamodel once it is available, but
not so many are willing/able to contribute to implementing it. So, we
would gladly welcome your contribution in this area. I'll do some
digging to find out what the latest status of the specification is...
Kenn
Ryan wrote:
>
> Kenn,
>
> Thanks for providing a status update.
>
> I looked on the OMG site and the only BPMN spec. they have published is
> version 1.2; so I guess version 2.0 is still in a review phase.
>
> I did find a document dated May 22, 2009 that was a consortium submittal
> in response to the RFP. However, don't know what relationship it has to
> anything approved by OMG.
>
> It is located at:
> http://www.bpmnstyle.com/wp-content/uploads/BPMN%202-0%20Spe cification%20BMI%2009-05-03.pdf
>
>
> If this document is close enough, or another document is available, I
> will be glad to work on creating a EMF model.
>
> Please let me know if there is something I can do to help get this
> project started.
>
> Regards,
> Ryan
>
|
|
|
Re: BPMN2 [message #617786 is a reply to message #480512] |
Wed, 19 August 2009 17:46  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Kenn,
I will check with the omg site (weekly) until the specification is published, then let the list know.
Until it is published, I guess we wait.
Regards,
Ryan
|
|
| | |
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Tue Jul 22 14:23:12 EDT 2025
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.50883 seconds
|