|
|
|
|
|
Re: [Epsilon] @Override on interface implementations [message #380500 is a reply to message #380489] |
Thu, 13 December 2007 07:50  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
FYI this has been fixed in the latest version (1.2.0) released today.
Cheers,
Dimitrios
Dimitrios Kolovos wrote:
> I've just updated the code on the CVS. I'll change the bug status to
> FIXED when we release a new version of the binaries (that would be 1.1.6).
>
> Cheers,
> Dimitrios
>
> Dimitrios Kolovos wrote:
>> Hi Aleksander,
>>
>> Thanks for your remarks. We'll address this asap.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Dimitrios
>>
>> Aleksander Bandelj wrote:
>>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=211210
>>>
>>> There is no Epsilon component in bugzilla for GMT.
>>>
>>> Reasons for sticking with Java 5:
>>>
>>> * only override annotations and HotSpotDiagnosticMXBean require JDK 6
>>> * Mac OS X still has no Java 6
>>> * Europe and Ganymede Eclipse platform should run on Java 5
>>>
>>>
>>> -a
>>>
>>> Dimitrios Kolovos wrote:
>>>> Hi Aleksander,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for reporting this. As you can guess those are annotations
>>>> generated by Eclipse when automatically overriding methods. We've
>>>> spotted this and recently updated (hopefully) all documents/pages to
>>>> mention that Java 6 is required. If you have a constraint that
>>>> requires you to use Epsilon under Java 5 you can enter a request in
>>>> the Bugzilla and we'll remove those extra annotations in the next
>>>> source code release.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Dimitrios
>>>>
>>>> Aleksander Bandelj wrote:
>>>>> As in org.epsilon.commons.util.ListSet . This only works on Java 6
>>>>> and causes compiler errors if Java compliance level is set to Java 5.
>>>>>
>>>>> -a
|
|
|
Re: [Epsilon] @Override on interface implementations [message #609684 is a reply to message #380485] |
Wed, 28 November 2007 07:06  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Aleksander,
Thanks for reporting this. As you can guess those are annotations
generated by Eclipse when automatically overriding methods. We've
spotted this and recently updated (hopefully) all documents/pages to
mention that Java 6 is required. If you have a constraint that requires
you to use Epsilon under Java 5 you can enter a request in the Bugzilla
and we'll remove those extra annotations in the next source code release.
Cheers,
Dimitrios
Aleksander Bandelj wrote:
> As in org.epsilon.commons.util.ListSet . This only works on Java 6 and
> causes compiler errors if Java compliance level is set to Java 5.
>
> -a
|
|
|
Re: [Epsilon] @Override on interface implementations [message #609686 is a reply to message #380486] |
Wed, 28 November 2007 08:41  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=211210
There is no Epsilon component in bugzilla for GMT.
Reasons for sticking with Java 5:
* only override annotations and HotSpotDiagnosticMXBean require JDK 6
* Mac OS X still has no Java 6
* Europe and Ganymede Eclipse platform should run on Java 5
-a
Dimitrios Kolovos wrote:
> Hi Aleksander,
>
> Thanks for reporting this. As you can guess those are annotations
> generated by Eclipse when automatically overriding methods. We've
> spotted this and recently updated (hopefully) all documents/pages to
> mention that Java 6 is required. If you have a constraint that
> requires you to use Epsilon under Java 5 you can enter a request in
> the Bugzilla and we'll remove those extra annotations in the next
> source code release.
>
> Cheers,
> Dimitrios
>
> Aleksander Bandelj wrote:
>> As in org.epsilon.commons.util.ListSet . This only works on Java 6
>> and causes compiler errors if Java compliance level is set to Java 5.
>>
>> -a
|
|
|
Re: [Epsilon] @Override on interface implementations [message #609687 is a reply to message #380487] |
Wed, 28 November 2007 08:48  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Aleksander,
Thanks for your remarks. We'll address this asap.
Cheers,
Dimitrios
Aleksander Bandelj wrote:
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=211210
>
> There is no Epsilon component in bugzilla for GMT.
>
> Reasons for sticking with Java 5:
>
> * only override annotations and HotSpotDiagnosticMXBean require JDK 6
> * Mac OS X still has no Java 6
> * Europe and Ganymede Eclipse platform should run on Java 5
>
>
> -a
>
> Dimitrios Kolovos wrote:
>> Hi Aleksander,
>>
>> Thanks for reporting this. As you can guess those are annotations
>> generated by Eclipse when automatically overriding methods. We've
>> spotted this and recently updated (hopefully) all documents/pages to
>> mention that Java 6 is required. If you have a constraint that
>> requires you to use Epsilon under Java 5 you can enter a request in
>> the Bugzilla and we'll remove those extra annotations in the next
>> source code release.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Dimitrios
>>
>> Aleksander Bandelj wrote:
>>> As in org.epsilon.commons.util.ListSet . This only works on Java 6
>>> and causes compiler errors if Java compliance level is set to Java 5.
>>>
>>> -a
|
|
|
Re: [Epsilon] @Override on interface implementations [message #609688 is a reply to message #380488] |
Wed, 28 November 2007 09:08  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
I've just updated the code on the CVS. I'll change the bug status to
FIXED when we release a new version of the binaries (that would be 1.1.6).
Cheers,
Dimitrios
Dimitrios Kolovos wrote:
> Hi Aleksander,
>
> Thanks for your remarks. We'll address this asap.
>
> Cheers,
> Dimitrios
>
> Aleksander Bandelj wrote:
>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=211210
>>
>> There is no Epsilon component in bugzilla for GMT.
>>
>> Reasons for sticking with Java 5:
>>
>> * only override annotations and HotSpotDiagnosticMXBean require JDK 6
>> * Mac OS X still has no Java 6
>> * Europe and Ganymede Eclipse platform should run on Java 5
>>
>>
>> -a
>>
>> Dimitrios Kolovos wrote:
>>> Hi Aleksander,
>>>
>>> Thanks for reporting this. As you can guess those are annotations
>>> generated by Eclipse when automatically overriding methods. We've
>>> spotted this and recently updated (hopefully) all documents/pages to
>>> mention that Java 6 is required. If you have a constraint that
>>> requires you to use Epsilon under Java 5 you can enter a request in
>>> the Bugzilla and we'll remove those extra annotations in the next
>>> source code release.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Dimitrios
>>>
>>> Aleksander Bandelj wrote:
>>>> As in org.epsilon.commons.util.ListSet . This only works on Java 6
>>>> and causes compiler errors if Java compliance level is set to Java 5.
>>>>
>>>> -a
|
|
|
Re: [Epsilon] @Override on interface implementations [message #611009 is a reply to message #380489] |
Thu, 13 December 2007 07:50  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
FYI this has been fixed in the latest version (1.2.0) released today.
Cheers,
Dimitrios
Dimitrios Kolovos wrote:
> I've just updated the code on the CVS. I'll change the bug status to
> FIXED when we release a new version of the binaries (that would be 1.1.6).
>
> Cheers,
> Dimitrios
>
> Dimitrios Kolovos wrote:
>> Hi Aleksander,
>>
>> Thanks for your remarks. We'll address this asap.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Dimitrios
>>
>> Aleksander Bandelj wrote:
>>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=211210
>>>
>>> There is no Epsilon component in bugzilla for GMT.
>>>
>>> Reasons for sticking with Java 5:
>>>
>>> * only override annotations and HotSpotDiagnosticMXBean require JDK 6
>>> * Mac OS X still has no Java 6
>>> * Europe and Ganymede Eclipse platform should run on Java 5
>>>
>>>
>>> -a
>>>
>>> Dimitrios Kolovos wrote:
>>>> Hi Aleksander,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for reporting this. As you can guess those are annotations
>>>> generated by Eclipse when automatically overriding methods. We've
>>>> spotted this and recently updated (hopefully) all documents/pages to
>>>> mention that Java 6 is required. If you have a constraint that
>>>> requires you to use Epsilon under Java 5 you can enter a request in
>>>> the Bugzilla and we'll remove those extra annotations in the next
>>>> source code release.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Dimitrios
>>>>
>>>> Aleksander Bandelj wrote:
>>>>> As in org.epsilon.commons.util.ListSet . This only works on Java 6
>>>>> and causes compiler errors if Java compliance level is set to Java 5.
>>>>>
>>>>> -a
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.08361 seconds