|
|
Re: Use cases [message #321 is a reply to message #275] |
Wed, 26 October 2005 12:05 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: thomas.bailey.sonyericsson.com
I would like to propose an addition in the form of JUnit support..
Java ME JUnit Support
Traditionally unit testing has only been feasible in the desktop or server
environments with mobile clients being disconnected from the testing
process. MTJ addresses this by offering an integrated on-device JUnit
derived unit testing framework that allows creation and management of
MIDlet based test cases and provides complete unit test coverage. MTJ is
provided with a suite
of default test cases to prove expected MIDlet behaviour which can form
the basis to creating more refined and project specific test case
portfolios. JUnit provides the bulk of unit testing functionality whilst
the phone connection and Java ME client is provided as part of the MTJ
suite.
|
|
|
Re: Use cases [message #323 is a reply to message #275] |
Wed, 26 October 2005 12:06 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: thomas.bailey.sonyericsson.com
As a general comment I think we should use the new naming strategy so that
our language is consistent in all documentation and source i.e Java ME not
J2ME.
My comments in regard to the current document are:
"Use Case: Create a new Class Prio 2"
Suggest Prio 1
"Developer can sign the application using a singing certificate"
Spelling error (singing)
"Deploy the application Prio 1, Sign the application Prio 2"
I think this is somewhat backwards especially given Java Verified. I am
not an expert on the topic but I assume signing is pretty fundamental to
it and this is being adopted by most operators and I assume channels.
Signing an application is probably a higher prio than tooling for
deployment. I would have deployment as prio 3.
"Execute the application Prio 2"
Suggest Prio 1 especially in contrast to deploying the application. I dont
believe that having functionality to help you bluetooth something to the
real phone or upload to an FTP site is more of a priority than being able
to launch and use the runtime to help develop it in the first place.
"Extend Deployment FW Prio 1"
Suggest Prio 3 as above.
Thoughts ?
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Use cases [message #1348 is a reply to message #321] |
Fri, 28 October 2005 10:17 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: thomas.bailey.sonyericsson.com
Mika we would like to do the use case for this JUnit proposal (if we all
agree it is a good to have)
|
|
|
Re: Use cases [message #1359 is a reply to message #1348] |
Fri, 28 October 2005 11:55 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: arto.laurila.nomail.nokia.com
Hi!
Yes, I also agree (on behalf of Mika) ;-)
You can certainly go further with the JUnit UC.
Make proposal and publish it here for review.
Br. Art
"Thomas Bailey" <thomas.bailey@sonyericsson.com> wrote in message
news:6a1a0a88deba7a6cf62838668e25af34$1@www.eclipse.org...
> Mika we would like to do the use case for this JUnit proposal (if we all
> agree it is a good to have)
>
|
|
|
Re: Use cases [message #3740 is a reply to message #321] |
Fri, 04 November 2005 23:43 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: steven.t.novakovich.nokia.com
Hi Thomas!
I would very much like to be part of this "MTJUnit" component of the
project.
\Steven
"Thomas Bailey" <thomas.bailey@sonyericsson.com> wrote in message
news:afd86f39fd0ea21b407a6d0b3466f3ec$1@www.eclipse.org...
>I would like to propose an addition in the form of JUnit support..
>
> Java ME JUnit Support
>
> Traditionally unit testing has only been feasible in the desktop or server
> environments with mobile clients being disconnected from the testing
> process. MTJ addresses this by offering an integrated on-device JUnit
> derived unit testing framework that allows creation and management of
> MIDlet based test cases and provides complete unit test coverage. MTJ is
> provided with a suite
> of default test cases to prove expected MIDlet behaviour which can form
> the basis to creating more refined and project specific test case
> portfolios. JUnit provides the bulk of unit testing functionality whilst
> the phone connection and Java ME client is provided as part of the MTJ
> suite.
|
|
|
|
Re: Use cases [message #4375 is a reply to message #321] |
Wed, 09 November 2005 15:36 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: steven.t.novakovich.nokia.com
Hi Thomas!
So this would be a "rewritten" JUnit testing framework that resides on the
devices?
How about an emulator-integrated JUnit testing framework?
: Steven
"Thomas Bailey" <thomas.bailey@sonyericsson.com> wrote in message
news:afd86f39fd0ea21b407a6d0b3466f3ec$1@www.eclipse.org...
>I would like to propose an addition in the form of JUnit support..
>
> Java ME JUnit Support
>
> Traditionally unit testing has only been feasible in the desktop or server
> environments with mobile clients being disconnected from the testing
> process. MTJ addresses this by offering an integrated on-device JUnit
> derived unit testing framework that allows creation and management of
> MIDlet based test cases and provides complete unit test coverage. MTJ is
> provided with a suite
> of default test cases to prove expected MIDlet behaviour which can form
> the basis to creating more refined and project specific test case
> portfolios. JUnit provides the bulk of unit testing functionality whilst
> the phone connection and Java ME client is provided as part of the MTJ
> suite.
|
|
|
|
Re: Use cases [message #560871 is a reply to message #275] |
Wed, 26 October 2005 12:05 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: thomas.bailey.sonyericsson.com
I would like to propose an addition in the form of JUnit support..
Java ME JUnit Support
Traditionally unit testing has only been feasible in the desktop or server
environments with mobile clients being disconnected from the testing
process. MTJ addresses this by offering an integrated on-device JUnit
derived unit testing framework that allows creation and management of
MIDlet based test cases and provides complete unit test coverage. MTJ is
provided with a suite
of default test cases to prove expected MIDlet behaviour which can form
the basis to creating more refined and project specific test case
portfolios. JUnit provides the bulk of unit testing functionality whilst
the phone connection and Java ME client is provided as part of the MTJ
suite.
|
|
|
Re: Use cases [message #560884 is a reply to message #275] |
Wed, 26 October 2005 12:06 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: thomas.bailey.sonyericsson.com
As a general comment I think we should use the new naming strategy so that
our language is consistent in all documentation and source i.e Java ME not
J2ME.
My comments in regard to the current document are:
"Use Case: Create a new Class Prio 2"
Suggest Prio 1
"Developer can sign the application using a singing certificate"
Spelling error (singing)
"Deploy the application Prio 1, Sign the application Prio 2"
I think this is somewhat backwards especially given Java Verified. I am
not an expert on the topic but I assume signing is pretty fundamental to
it and this is being adopted by most operators and I assume channels.
Signing an application is probably a higher prio than tooling for
deployment. I would have deployment as prio 3.
"Execute the application Prio 2"
Suggest Prio 1 especially in contrast to deploying the application. I dont
believe that having functionality to help you bluetooth something to the
real phone or upload to an FTP site is more of a priority than being able
to launch and use the runtime to help develop it in the first place.
"Extend Deployment FW Prio 1"
Suggest Prio 3 as above.
Thoughts ?
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Use cases [message #560947 is a reply to message #321] |
Fri, 28 October 2005 10:17 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: thomas.bailey.sonyericsson.com
Mika we would like to do the use case for this JUnit proposal (if we all
agree it is a good to have)
|
|
|
|
Re: Use cases [message #561558 is a reply to message #321] |
Fri, 04 November 2005 23:43 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: steven.t.novakovich.nokia.com
Hi Thomas!
I would very much like to be part of this "MTJUnit" component of the
project.
\Steven
"Thomas Bailey" <thomas.bailey@sonyericsson.com> wrote in message
news:afd86f39fd0ea21b407a6d0b3466f3ec$1@www.eclipse.org...
>I would like to propose an addition in the form of JUnit support..
>
> Java ME JUnit Support
>
> Traditionally unit testing has only been feasible in the desktop or server
> environments with mobile clients being disconnected from the testing
> process. MTJ addresses this by offering an integrated on-device JUnit
> derived unit testing framework that allows creation and management of
> MIDlet based test cases and provides complete unit test coverage. MTJ is
> provided with a suite
> of default test cases to prove expected MIDlet behaviour which can form
> the basis to creating more refined and project specific test case
> portfolios. JUnit provides the bulk of unit testing functionality whilst
> the phone connection and Java ME client is provided as part of the MTJ
> suite.
|
|
|
|
Re: Use cases [message #561727 is a reply to message #321] |
Wed, 09 November 2005 15:36 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: steven.t.novakovich.nokia.com
Hi Thomas!
So this would be a "rewritten" JUnit testing framework that resides on the
devices?
How about an emulator-integrated JUnit testing framework?
: Steven
"Thomas Bailey" <thomas.bailey@sonyericsson.com> wrote in message
news:afd86f39fd0ea21b407a6d0b3466f3ec$1@www.eclipse.org...
>I would like to propose an addition in the form of JUnit support..
>
> Java ME JUnit Support
>
> Traditionally unit testing has only been feasible in the desktop or server
> environments with mobile clients being disconnected from the testing
> process. MTJ addresses this by offering an integrated on-device JUnit
> derived unit testing framework that allows creation and management of
> MIDlet based test cases and provides complete unit test coverage. MTJ is
> provided with a suite
> of default test cases to prove expected MIDlet behaviour which can form
> the basis to creating more refined and project specific test case
> portfolios. JUnit provides the bulk of unit testing functionality whilst
> the phone connection and Java ME client is provided as part of the MTJ
> suite.
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.05565 seconds