|
|
|
Re: OpenUP/Basic 1.0 Review [message #33291 is a reply to message #33045] |
Thu, 31 May 2007 02:14 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: christopher.fuhrman.etsmtl.ca
Charles Edwards wrote:
> I like the wiki interface for collaboration too.
This is a great way to get feedback on a work in progress. Is there
documentation about how to create a wiki version of an arbitrary EPF
plug-in during its publication? I didn't recall this as being a
functionality of EPF's composer.
--
Prof. Christopher Fuhrman
Department of Software and IT Engineering
University of Quebec - École de technologie supérieure (ETS)
http://profs.logti.etsmtl.ca/cfuhrman/index.shtml?en
+1 (514) 396 8638
|
|
|
Re: OpenUP/Basic 1.0 Review [message #33326 is a reply to message #33291] |
Thu, 31 May 2007 02:19 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: christopher.fuhrman.etsmtl.ca
Christopher Fuhrman wrote:
> Charles Edwards wrote:
>> I like the wiki interface for collaboration too.
>
> This is a great way to get feedback on a work in progress. Is there
> documentation about how to create a wiki version of an arbitrary EPF
> plug-in during its publication? I didn't recall this as being a
> functionality of EPF's composer.
I think I just found it on the about page of the wiki site:
http://www.epfwiki.net/other/about
> Downloads
>
> As this technology is still under Eclipse Legal Review it is not available as a download. It is planned to become available in the third quarter of 2007. It will then be made available on the download section of the EPF site.
Did I get it right?
--
Prof. Christopher Fuhrman
Department of Software and IT Engineering
University of Quebec - École de technologie supérieure (ETS)
http://profs.logti.etsmtl.ca/cfuhrman/index.shtml?en
+1 (514) 396 8638
|
|
|
Re: OpenUP/Basic 1.0 Review [message #33721 is a reply to message #33010] |
Mon, 25 June 2007 11:52 |
Roman Smirak Messages: 136 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Jim and others,
I'm basically responding to your request for feedback.
* Context:
Our company has been adopting RUP; the company employs +15,000 people, there
are different customers, technologies and processes in use currently (mostly
waterfall-like); my mission: as the RUP mentor I'm helping the projects to
convert from the current model to agile practices. As agile practices
becomes more and more popular (Scrum, XP) we decided to support their
implementation within the company and release a combination of UP+Scrum+XP;
we decided to base it on OpenUP/Basic.
* Current status:
We went through the OpenUP/Basic, "assessed" it from CMMI perspective (our
company requires) and I would like to say you have done great job! It helps
us very much at this moment. However we need to do some changes, mostly at
guidance level (e.g. Work items list in Jira), of course; the exceptions:
1/ Decision making: We are about to create a task Make a decision and
assign it to all disciplines to show people they should consider
alternatives in team (their pros and cons) at several levels: planning,
implementation (pair programming is a good trigger for this), etc.
2/ Configuration management: we will probably add stuff like
configuration management plan, audit, etc. - not deeply considered yet
3/ Change management: I like to solution based on common work items list
(one common solution for requirements, CRs, bugs, tasks, etc.) - that's the
way we have been using it (tailored RUP) for quite long time; however I'm
about to say more about regular team meetings (core team meetings in case of
larger project - some sort of generalization of Change control board)
handling recent changes and scheduling them (in context of PM/Manage
iteration)
* My question:
- It is related to point 3/ Change management: Manage iteration task (under
PM) has four steps however non of them relates to change management anyhow -
I would have a step regularly organizing handling changes in order to
reschedule current or next (preferably) iteration (part of Manage
objectives?)
Once again, thanks a lot for great tool!
Roman
"Jim Ruehlin" <jruehlin@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
news:f2t39j$bhi$1@build.eclipse.org...
> Hello,
>
> Version 1.0 of OpenUP/Basic is targeted for the end of June. If you
> haven't contributed to OpenUP/Basic yet, we
|
|
|
|
|
Re: OpenUP/Basic 1.0 Review [message #578887 is a reply to message #33045] |
Thu, 31 May 2007 02:14 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: christopher.fuhrman.etsmtl.ca
Charles Edwards wrote:
> I like the wiki interface for collaboration too.
This is a great way to get feedback on a work in progress. Is there
documentation about how to create a wiki version of an arbitrary EPF
plug-in during its publication? I didn't recall this as being a
functionality of EPF's composer.
--
Prof. Christopher Fuhrman
Department of Software and IT Engineering
University of Quebec - École de technologie supérieure (ETS)
http://profs.logti.etsmtl.ca/cfuhrman/index.shtml?en
+1 (514) 396 8638
|
|
|
Re: OpenUP/Basic 1.0 Review [message #578920 is a reply to message #33291] |
Thu, 31 May 2007 02:19 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: christopher.fuhrman.etsmtl.ca
Christopher Fuhrman wrote:
> Charles Edwards wrote:
>> I like the wiki interface for collaboration too.
>
> This is a great way to get feedback on a work in progress. Is there
> documentation about how to create a wiki version of an arbitrary EPF
> plug-in during its publication? I didn't recall this as being a
> functionality of EPF's composer.
I think I just found it on the about page of the wiki site:
http://www.epfwiki.net/other/about
> Downloads
>
> As this technology is still under Eclipse Legal Review it is not available as a download. It is planned to become available in the third quarter of 2007. It will then be made available on the download section of the EPF site.
Did I get it right?
--
Prof. Christopher Fuhrman
Department of Software and IT Engineering
University of Quebec - École de technologie supérieure (ETS)
http://profs.logti.etsmtl.ca/cfuhrman/index.shtml?en
+1 (514) 396 8638
|
|
|
Re: OpenUP/Basic 1.0 Review [message #579184 is a reply to message #33010] |
Mon, 25 June 2007 11:52 |
Roman Smirak Messages: 136 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Jim and others,
I'm basically responding to your request for feedback.
* Context:
Our company has been adopting RUP; the company employs +15,000 people, there
are different customers, technologies and processes in use currently (mostly
waterfall-like); my mission: as the RUP mentor I'm helping the projects to
convert from the current model to agile practices. As agile practices
becomes more and more popular (Scrum, XP) we decided to support their
implementation within the company and release a combination of UP+Scrum+XP;
we decided to base it on OpenUP/Basic.
* Current status:
We went through the OpenUP/Basic, "assessed" it from CMMI perspective (our
company requires) and I would like to say you have done great job! It helps
us very much at this moment. However we need to do some changes, mostly at
guidance level (e.g. Work items list in Jira), of course; the exceptions:
1/ Decision making: We are about to create a task Make a decision and
assign it to all disciplines to show people they should consider
alternatives in team (their pros and cons) at several levels: planning,
implementation (pair programming is a good trigger for this), etc.
2/ Configuration management: we will probably add stuff like
configuration management plan, audit, etc. - not deeply considered yet
3/ Change management: I like to solution based on common work items list
(one common solution for requirements, CRs, bugs, tasks, etc.) - that's the
way we have been using it (tailored RUP) for quite long time; however I'm
about to say more about regular team meetings (core team meetings in case of
larger project - some sort of generalization of Change control board)
handling recent changes and scheduling them (in context of PM/Manage
iteration)
* My question:
- It is related to point 3/ Change management: Manage iteration task (under
PM) has four steps however non of them relates to change management anyhow -
I would have a step regularly organizing handling changes in order to
reschedule current or next (preferably) iteration (part of Manage
objectives?)
Once again, thanks a lot for great tool!
Roman
"Jim Ruehlin" <jruehlin@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
news:f2t39j$bhi$1@build.eclipse.org...
> Hello,
>
> Version 1.0 of OpenUP/Basic is targeted for the end of June. If you
> haven't contributed to OpenUP/Basic yet, we
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.05002 seconds