|
| Re: Have the intro page anchors changed for Eclipse 3.2? [message #302627 is a reply to message #302617] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 16:09  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Ted Habeck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm testing some plug-ins which contribute intropages under Eclipse 3.2.
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
> <introContent>
> <!-- Extension to the SDK Overview Page. -->
> <extensionContent alt-style="css/swt.properties"
> style="css/news.css" path="news/page-content/noteworthy-links/pdeAnchor">
> <link label="Security Workbench Development for Java"
> url=" http://org.eclipse.ui.intro/showHelpTopic?id=/com.ibm.securi ty.sword4j.help/html/news/new41065.html"
> style-id="tutorials-link" id="sword4j">
> <text>What's new in release 1.0.65</text>
> </link>
> </extensionContent>
> </introContent>
>
> The above works fine for Eclipse 3.0-3.1, but does not work under
> Eclipse 3.2.
>
> Have the paths changed for intro content?
This seems to have solved the problem:
I noticed the configExtension configId changed from:
org.eclipse.platform.introConfig
to:
org.eclipse.ui.intro.universalConfig
So, I added 3 new configExtensions to plugin.xml.
Next, I had to change the path links in the associated intro pages for
the 32 implementation.
path="overview/@"
path="whatsnew/@"
path="tutorial/@"
It now works for versions 3.0-3.2 RC1a.
---- example config extensions -----
<extension point="org.eclipse.ui.intro.configExtension">
<configExtension
configId="org.eclipse.ui.intro.universalConfig"
content="intro/introContent32.xml"/>
<configExtension
configId="org.eclipse.ui.intro.universalConfig"
content="intro/tutorialContent32.xml"/>
<configExtension
configId="org.eclipse.ui.intro.universalConfig"
content="intro/newContent32.xml"/>
<configExtension
configId="org.eclipse.ui.intro.introConfig"
content="intro/introContent.xml"/>
<configExtension
configId="org.eclipse.ui.intro.introConfig"
content="intro/tutorialContent.xml"/>
<configExtension
configId="org.eclipse.ui.intro.introConfig"
content="intro/newContent.xml"/>
</extension>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04010 seconds
Home