| Graphical Overview/Map of Connections/Hirachie [message #271386] |
Fri, 05 June 2009 05:32  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hello,
I am a total newbie to Eclipse, I only have experience with light
programming. But I work on a project where we use Ecplise and I try to
understand the software in progess.
I was wonderin if a function in Ecplise exists which shows graphically how
the different packages/classes are connected. So which part is calling
which part and/or exchaning data. E.g. somehow a map of
connections/hierachies/flows.
That is one of the things, that I imagine that exist and it is easier to
get directed to it than trying to find onself. And if it is one of the
things which laymen imagine easily, but is in fact very difficult and
doesn't exist, it easier to be said directly before learning it the hard
way.
Thanks for any input!
Have a great day,
Stefan
|
|
|
| Re: Graphical Overview/Map of Connections/Hirachie [message #271395 is a reply to message #271386] |
Fri, 05 June 2009 06:52  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: none.domain.invalid
stefan a écrit :
> Hello,
> I am a total newbie to Eclipse, I only have experience with light
> programming. But I work on a project where we use Ecplise and I try to
> understand the software in progess.
> I was wonderin if a function in Ecplise exists which shows graphically
> how the different packages/classes are connected. So which part is
> calling which part and/or exchaning data. E.g. somehow a map of
> connections/hierachies/flows.
>
There must be one plugin to dataflow inside of a method, and another to
see class/package connections, but not everything at the same time. The
eclipse plugins can be found here :
http://www.eclipseplugincentral.com/
I have never seen the "exchange of data" in any eclipse tool, or even
any java tool at all.
> That is one of the things, that I imagine that exist and it is easier to
> get directed to it than trying to find onself. And if it is one of the
> things which laymen imagine easily, but is in fact very difficult and
> doesn't exist, it easier to be said directly before learning it the hard
> way.
True.
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.06171 seconds
Home