Skip to main content



      Home
Home » Eclipse Projects » Eclipse Platform » "Background Indexer Crash Recovery" possible bug
"Background Indexer Crash Recovery" possible bug [message #260666] Mon, 12 July 2004 10:28 Go to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: aheenan.ie.ibm.com

Version:3.0.0
Build id: 200406251208

I was wondering was anyone else getting this error??

I searched and found that there have been some
bugs logged notably 39545 and 40950 regarding
previous builds.

Rgds,
A.

--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
Re: "Background Indexer Crash Recovery" possible bug [message #260877 is a reply to message #260666] Mon, 12 July 2004 15:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: jplatt.austin.ibm.com

Angela Heenan wrote:

> Version:3.0.0
> Build id: 200406251208

> I was wondering was anyone else getting this error??

> I searched and found that there have been some
> bugs logged notably 39545 and 40950 regarding
> previous builds.

> Rgds,
> A.

This is a perpetual part of my development life in
Eclipse. Maybe four or five in a typical hour.
I've overcommitted my physical memory (512m)
on the command line (to 640m) to no avail. I keep
hoping nothing important is being affected by it, but
since I keep getting runaways during debug sessions
(have to kill the Eclipse javaw), I wonder.

jim
Re: "Background Indexer Crash Recovery" possible bug [message #260978 is a reply to message #260877] Tue, 13 July 2004 02:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Jim, have you entered a bug report ?

Jerome

"Jim Platt" <jplatt@austin.ibm.com> wrote in message
news:ccupec$e0k$1@eclipse.org...
> Angela Heenan wrote:
>
> > Version:3.0.0
> > Build id: 200406251208
>
> > I was wondering was anyone else getting this error??
>
> > I searched and found that there have been some
> > bugs logged notably 39545 and 40950 regarding
> > previous builds.
>
> > Rgds,
> > A.
>
> This is a perpetual part of my development life in
> Eclipse. Maybe four or five in a typical hour.
> I've overcommitted my physical memory (512m)
> on the command line (to 640m) to no avail. I keep
> hoping nothing important is being affected by it, but
> since I keep getting runaways during debug sessions
> (have to kill the Eclipse javaw), I wonder.
>
> jim
>
Re: "Background Indexer Crash Recovery" possible bug [message #261128 is a reply to message #260978] Tue, 13 July 2004 10:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: jplatt.austin.ibm.com

Jerome Lanneluc wrote:

> Jim, have you entered a bug report ?

> Jerome

Jerome -

No - Since, in my mind, it's at least as likely a user
error that I haven't figured out as it is a bug, or
that I didn't read some hw requirement that might say,
"Run it with at least 1 gig memory or don't blame the
software." At least until I see if it's a common issue
(there's no one else close at hand here to compare
experiences with).

Angela's note is an indication that it might be more
common, but still, whether we know enough to suppose it
might be worth a bug report .... I'm not sure yet.

Surely (I think to myself) I'm not doing anything all that
unusual, so if it's a bug, there'd be lots of others
reporting it.

jim
Re: "Background Indexer Crash Recovery" possible bug [message #262009 is a reply to message #261128] Fri, 16 July 2004 10:40 Go to previous message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: eclipse.removeMe.guide.andRemoveMe.earthlink.andMeToo.com

I had this problem; switching to the Sun JRE 1.4.2_04 cured it.

-- Dan
--------------------------------------------------------
co-author, "The Java Developer's Guide to Eclipse"
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0321159640

"Jim Platt" <jplatt@austin.ibm.com> wrote in message
news:cd0q2n$klb$1@eclipse.org...
> Jerome Lanneluc wrote:
>
> > Jim, have you entered a bug report ?
>
> > Jerome
>
> Jerome -
>
> No - Since, in my mind, it's at least as likely a user
> error that I haven't figured out as it is a bug, or
> that I didn't read some hw requirement that might say,
> "Run it with at least 1 gig memory or don't blame the
> software." At least until I see if it's a common issue
> (there's no one else close at hand here to compare
> experiences with).
>
> Angela's note is an indication that it might be more
> common, but still, whether we know enough to suppose it
> might be worth a bug report .... I'm not sure yet.
>
> Surely (I think to myself) I'm not doing anything all that
> unusual, so if it's a bug, there'd be lots of others
> reporting it.
>
> jim
>
Previous Topic:Trouble with update sites
Next Topic:eclipse runtime classpath
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Jul 15 00:05:33 EDT 2025

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.28077 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top