| Source code for eclipse.exe? [message #25368] |
Mon, 06 October 2008 17:45  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: doddsie.verizon.net
Where can I find the source code for eclipse.exe?
Or
how can I hook into the startup?
Previously, I replaced startup.jar, but would like a more elegant solution.
Cheers,
Dave
|
|
|
| Re: Source code for eclipse.exe? [message #25606 is a reply to message #25368] |
Tue, 07 October 2008 11:13  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Source code for the exe is in :
dev.eclipse.org/cvsroot/rt/org.eclipse.equinox/framework/bun dles/org.eclipse.equinox.executable
Source code for the startup.jar replacement (since 3.3) is the
org.eclipse.equinox.launcher bundle at that same location.
Starting in 3.4, the launcher can use any .jar to start up. Specify
-startup on the command line. The launcher will read the Main-Class
manifest header to find the main class. It requires that class to have a
constructor with no arguments, and to have a method "int run(String [])"
-Andrew
doddsie wrote:
> Where can I find the source code for eclipse.exe?
>
> Or
>
> how can I hook into the startup?
>
> Previously, I replaced startup.jar, but would like a more elegant solution.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: Source code for eclipse.exe? [message #582423 is a reply to message #25368] |
Tue, 07 October 2008 11:13 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Source code for the exe is in :
dev.eclipse.org/cvsroot/rt/org.eclipse.equinox/framework/bun dles/org.eclipse.equinox.executable
Source code for the startup.jar replacement (since 3.3) is the
org.eclipse.equinox.launcher bundle at that same location.
Starting in 3.4, the launcher can use any .jar to start up. Specify
-startup on the command line. The launcher will read the Main-Class
manifest header to find the main class. It requires that class to have a
constructor with no arguments, and to have a method "int run(String [])"
-Andrew
doddsie wrote:
> Where can I find the source code for eclipse.exe?
>
> Or
>
> how can I hook into the startup?
>
> Previously, I replaced startup.jar, but would like a more elegant solution.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave
>
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04431 seconds
Home