| AMD64 processor. Did Eclipse need to do anything special? VE isn't working on it. [message #255626] |
Fri, 25 June 2004 11:41  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: richkulp.NO.SPAM.us.ibm.com
Hi,
Did Eclipse need to do any special java code for working on a Linux
AMD64 system?
Someone just reported that the VE doesn't work right on it. They are
getting wierd code being generated by us. We aren't using any JNI code.
And we are using straight updates to the jdt idocuments using insert
positions and such. But code is being inserted in wierd spots from where
it should be.
int stays 32 bit in a 64 bit system in java doesn't it? We don't have to
worry about larger standard ints, do we?
Any ideas would be appreciated.
--
Thanks, Rich Kulp
|
|
|
|
| Re: AMD64 processor. Did Eclipse need to do anything special? VE isn't working on it. [message #255637 is a reply to message #255630] |
Fri, 25 June 2004 11:57  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: thomas_maeder.ch.ibm.com
Oh, and of course your VM needs to be 64bit safe (i.e. not make wrong
assumption about native datatype sizes.
Thomas Mäder wrote:
> Ints stay ints, you're right, so any pure java program shoud just work.
> I figure the problem starts when you have native libraries (SWT, anyone?).
>
> Thomas
>
> Rich Kulp wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Did Eclipse need to do any special java code for working on a Linux
>> AMD64 system?
>>
>> Someone just reported that the VE doesn't work right on it. They are
>> getting wierd code being generated by us. We aren't using any JNI
>> code. And we are using straight updates to the jdt idocuments using
>> insert positions and such. But code is being inserted in wierd spots
>> from where it should be.
>>
>> int stays 32 bit in a 64 bit system in java doesn't it? We don't have
>> to worry about larger standard ints, do we?
>>
>> Any ideas would be appreciated.
>>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03041 seconds
Home