Very basic 3.0 questions [message #252086] |
Sat, 12 June 2004 15:06  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: alex.schroeder.gmx.net
Hello all,
I'm on the way of porting some 2.1 based plugins to 3.0 and stumbled over
some things were I found nothing obvious in the documentation:
1) My existing plugin derives of AbstractUIPlugin. That's there also in 3.0,
but its constructor uses the new deprecated IPluginDescriptor.
What's best done to avoid that deprecation warnings (and the use of the
deprecated interface at all ...)
2) The plugin did make use of the install URL (to use relative paths in
lookup of lots of icons). Getting that URL touches again that deprecated
IPluginDescriptor. There is described in the docs that "it is replaced by
equivalents in Bundle or Platform" but actually
I didn't get exactly the point - or just overlooked something, So where do I
get that install URL now best from?
If I overlooked some obvious point in the documentation, it's fine if you
would point that out
Thanks
Alex
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Very basic 3.0 questions [message #252144 is a reply to message #252086] |
Sun, 13 June 2004 04:03  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: ilias.lazaridis.com
Alexander Schröder wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm on the way of porting some 2.1 based plugins to 3.0 and stumbled over
> some things were I found nothing obvious in the documentation:
>
> 1) My existing plugin derives of AbstractUIPlugin. That's there also in 3.0,
> but its constructor uses the new deprecated IPluginDescriptor.
> What's best done to avoid that deprecation warnings (and the use of the
> deprecated interface at all ...)
>
> 2) The plugin did make use of the install URL (to use relative paths in
> lookup of lots of icons). Getting that URL touches again that deprecated
> IPluginDescriptor. There is described in the docs that "it is replaced by
> equivalents in Bundle or Platform" but actually
> I didn't get exactly the point - or just overlooked something, So where do I
> get that install URL now best from?
>
> If I overlooked some obvious point in the documentation, it's fine if you
> would point that out
possibly this one:
Eclipse 3.0 Adoption Guide
http://www.eclipsepowered.org/archives/2004/06/01/eclipse-30 -adoption-guide/
> Thanks
> Alex
>
>
--
http://www.lazaridis.com
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03742 seconds